1958
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb40844.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of Transplanation Immunity in Hamsters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hamster cheek pouch is an ideal site for the implantation of tissues and cells, both from other species and humans (Lutz and Patt, 1952;Handler et al, 1956;Resnick et al, 1960), since it is not an immunologically privileged site and immunosuppressive and immunostimulating agents can modulate the intensity of the local immune response (Shklar et al, 1979). Transplantability of HCPC I cells to randombred hamsters rests on the monomorphic aspect of their major histocompatibility complex (Billingham and Hildemann, 1958;Palm et al, 1967). This peculiarity serves to illustrate the efficacy of DNA vaccination against HER-2 in a genetically heterogeneous (not inbred) population displaying some features similar to those in human.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hamster cheek pouch is an ideal site for the implantation of tissues and cells, both from other species and humans (Lutz and Patt, 1952;Handler et al, 1956;Resnick et al, 1960), since it is not an immunologically privileged site and immunosuppressive and immunostimulating agents can modulate the intensity of the local immune response (Shklar et al, 1979). Transplantability of HCPC I cells to randombred hamsters rests on the monomorphic aspect of their major histocompatibility complex (Billingham and Hildemann, 1958;Palm et al, 1967). This peculiarity serves to illustrate the efficacy of DNA vaccination against HER-2 in a genetically heterogeneous (not inbred) population displaying some features similar to those in human.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate, therefore, as Billingham and Hildeman have recently reemphasized (30), that when the genetic difference between donor and recipient is small the survival of skin grafts is correspondingly increased, the longer survival times probably occurring when more closely related animals are selected from a partially inbred, and therefore still heterogeneous, population. These experiments show that reaction to parathyroid grafts can be so debilitated as to allow their functional survival in the presence of the state of heightened reactivity entailed in a second set response to skin from the same donor.…”
Section: Da Y9mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Billingham & Hildemann [1958] carried out experiments with skin homografts on four different colonies of golden hamsters in this country, and found that the fate of skin homografts of hamsters from different colonies varied consider¬ ably. With certain combinations, the animals rejected the grafts vigorously, whereas with other colony combinations the grafts survived as well as intra-colony grafts.…”
Section: Pregnancy and Lactationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Adams [1958] reported that skin homografts had been made successfully between golden and albino hamsters from four different sources in the United States. Billingham & Hildemann [1958] have discussed possible reasons for the feeble nature of the homograft reaction in hamsters. Adams et al [1956] had postulated that the hamsters' ability to respond to tissue homografts might be defective.…”
Section: Pregnancy and Lactationmentioning
confidence: 99%