Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the non-linear change of D with temperature demonstrates that the investigated redox system does not really obey the Stokes-Einstein equation: D = k B T/6prg (where: k B is Boltzmann's constant, r the hydrodynamic radius of the diffusing species, and g the viscosity of solvent medium) [24]. It is, therefore, probable that due to solvation effects, the hydrodynamic radius of the involved redox species is not constant [25]. However, it must be mentioned that the hexacyanoferrate(III) ion, due to its unsymmetrical charge distribution and its higher charge density, is more easily solvated than the more voluminous hexacyanoferrate(II) ion with symmetrical charge distribution [26].…”
Section: Cyclic Voltammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the non-linear change of D with temperature demonstrates that the investigated redox system does not really obey the Stokes-Einstein equation: D = k B T/6prg (where: k B is Boltzmann's constant, r the hydrodynamic radius of the diffusing species, and g the viscosity of solvent medium) [24]. It is, therefore, probable that due to solvation effects, the hydrodynamic radius of the involved redox species is not constant [25]. However, it must be mentioned that the hexacyanoferrate(III) ion, due to its unsymmetrical charge distribution and its higher charge density, is more easily solvated than the more voluminous hexacyanoferrate(II) ion with symmetrical charge distribution [26].…”
Section: Cyclic Voltammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would calculate a numerical value of λo ± x 10 4 = 10.15 for the tetrabutylammonium cation from the authors' data. (Tsierkezos and Philippopoulos [3] calculated a slightly different numerical value of λo ± x 10 4 = 10.50 as they assumed that the molar conductivity of the tetrabutylammonium was slightly larger than the molar conductivity of the tetraphenylborate anion, e.g., λo ± cation = 1.07 x λo ± anion -this particular approach takes into account the slight differences in the crystallographic radii of the two reference ions Computations are not performed for Bu4PMS dissolved in N,N-dimethylacetamide as I…”
Section: Ksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an information note several researchers [3][4][5] have modified the Bu4NBPh4 reference electrolyte method:…”
Section: Ksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical values of λ o ± for the tetrabuylammonium cation would be set equal to the numerical values of λ o ± for the tetraphenylboride anion in each of the three solvents studied. This is easy to do in the case of nitromethane as Dewan 8 One could alternatively use another version 9,10 that takes into account the slight differences in ion size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%