Structured literature review about intellectual capital and innovation

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. Research limitations/implications -The estimation procedure allowed only a partial validation of the proposed model because, although positive, the relationships between MAS and RC, between HC and performance and between RC and organizational performance were not statistically significant. Practical implications -The study highlights the role of MAS as information networks that collect, process and communicate information that influences the development of IC, as well as networks of relationships that support the establishment of conditions for the creation and integration of organizational knowledge and the development of IC. Originality/value -In this research, an arguably more complete framework of the relations between MAS, IC and performance is developed and empirically tested. Despite the existence of some literature addressing the relationship between MAS and IC, this is the first study, of which authors are aware, that focuses specifically on the relationships between MAS and the three dimensions of IC (HC, SC and RC), as well as their effects on organizational performance.

Intangible assets and organizational citizenship behavior: A conceptual model

“…In addition, IAs improve organizations' innovation activities ( Buenechea-Elberdin, 2017 ; Delgado-Verde et al., 2016 ; Dost et al., 2016 ; Kianto et al., 2017 ; Subramaniam and Youndt, 2005 ; Wu et al., 2008 ; Zerenler et al., 2008 ) and also enhance organizations’ ambidextrous learning ( Kang and Snell, 2009 ); the importance of IAs even stretches to international organizations in improving their export performance ( Pucar, 2012 ). Furthermore, the impacts of IAs are reflected in both service and manufacturing organizations ( Kianto et al., 2010 ), in nonprofit organizational performance ( Sillanpää et al., 2010 ), and in strategic orientations and approaches ( Roos et al, 2001 ; Walsh et al., 2008 ).…”

Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and organizational results in SMES: are they related?

“…While the accumulated literature on IC has demonstrated well its importance for various types of outcomes for organizational performance (see, e.g., Inkinen, 2015;Buenechea-Elberdin, 2017), several important gaps in the current knowledge remain. First, studies have proposed that the relation between IC and knowledge management is an important concept to develop further (Kianto et al, 2014).…”

Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?

“…In this context, literature reviews represent a helpful kind of academic writing for summarizing extant knowledge, deliver policy suggestions, and supporting practice [27,33,40]. Literature reviews in social sciences can be undertaken for a variety of purposes, such as for classifying extant knowledge according to specific concepts [41] or understanding the relationship between two distinguished concepts [42]. Although all these instances share a common starting point that is the summary of the evidence, the multiplicity of purposes that they may have has implied the development of several methodologies and approaches to conduct them.…”