2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a Dihydroxycoumarin Active-Site Inhibitor in Complex with the RNase H Domain of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase and Structure–Activity Analysis of Inhibitor Analogs

Abstract: HIV encodes four essential enzymes: protease, integrase, reverse transcriptase (RT) associated DNA polymerase, and RT-associated ribonuclease H (RNase H). Current clinically approved anti-AIDS drugs target all HIV enzymatic activities except RNase H, which has proven to be a very difficult target for HIV drug discovery. Our high-throughput screening activities identified the dihydroxycoumarin compound F3284-8495 as a specific inhibitor of RT RNase H, with low micromolar potency in vitro. Optimization of inhibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Q500 has been reported as one of the key residues responsible for RNA:DNA hybrid binding, [35] and it was recently proposed as a possible druggable binding site for allosteric RNase H inhibitors. [36][37][38] Theoretically, compounds interacting with residue Q500 (Figure 3), or residues in its vicinity that are important for RNA:DNA substrate positioning, could potentially interfere with duplex accommodation in the active site of RNase H. [36] On the basis of these results, we hypothesized that the binding of cHTC derivatives to the allosteric site of RNase H could be affected by competition with the RNA:DNA duplex, especially for compounds that were weaker inhibitors. To test this hypothesis, the RNase H activity of compounds 31 and 33 was re-assayed by modifying the order of addition of the RNA:DNA duplex substrate.…”
Section: Mode Of Action Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q500 has been reported as one of the key residues responsible for RNA:DNA hybrid binding, [35] and it was recently proposed as a possible druggable binding site for allosteric RNase H inhibitors. [36][37][38] Theoretically, compounds interacting with residue Q500 (Figure 3), or residues in its vicinity that are important for RNA:DNA substrate positioning, could potentially interfere with duplex accommodation in the active site of RNase H. [36] On the basis of these results, we hypothesized that the binding of cHTC derivatives to the allosteric site of RNase H could be affected by competition with the RNA:DNA duplex, especially for compounds that were weaker inhibitors. To test this hypothesis, the RNase H activity of compounds 31 and 33 was re-assayed by modifying the order of addition of the RNA:DNA duplex substrate.…”
Section: Mode Of Action Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hydroxyisoquinolinedione (HID, 1 ), 10 β-thujaplicinol ( 2 ), 11 and dihydroxycoumarin ( 3 ). 12 More potent and selective RNase H inhibition was achieved with structurally more elaborate chemotypes, such as diketoacid 4 , 13 pyrimidinol carboxylic acid 5 , 14 hydroxynaphthyridine 6 15 and pyridopyrimidone 7 , 16 all featuring a hydrophobic aromatic moiety seemingly important for antiviral activity. Compounds 6–7 are among the very few RNase H inhibitors with reported antiviral activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dihydroxycoumarins were identified by virtual screening and emerged as a promising scaffold for the development of HIV-1 RNase H inhibitors when compound F3284-8495 ( Figure 12), 7,8-dihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromen-4-yl)acetic acid, was co-crystallized within the HIV-1 RNase H active site (Himmel et al, 2014). The compound coordinated the two metal ions within the active site, while making additional interactions with His539.…”
Section: Dihydroxycoumarinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, when compounds are reported to have a high potency in biochemical assays, such as in the low nanomolar range, in most cases there is not a correspondent potency in inhibiting viral replication, raising some concerns about the reliability of the enzymatic assay. To optimize the outcome, the assay should, for example, use conditions that reflect better the physiological ones (Himmel et al, 2014). Second, in the case of active site inhibitors, most of the currently identified compounds often exhibit, together with increased potency, higher toxicity, probably related to inhibition of host counterparts (e.g.…”
Section: Perspectives and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%