2015
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure‐Aware Mesh Decimation

Abstract: We present a novel approach for the decimation of triangle surface meshes. Our algorithm takes as input a triangle surface mesh and a set of planar proxies detected in a pre-processing analysis step, and structured via an adjacency graph. It then performs greedy mesh decimation through a series of edge collapse, designed to approximate the local mesh geometry as well as the geometry and structure of proxies. Such structure-preserving approach is well suited to planar abstraction, i.e. extreme decimation approx… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] at the pixel scale gives dense and structure-free 3D models. By postprocessing a DSM with Voronoi clustering [27] or with structure-aware mesh simplification [33], we obtain more compact meshes, but the building structure cannot be not restored. Our output model is both compact and structure-aware (see the low number of principal directions in the distribution of output normals).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] at the pixel scale gives dense and structure-free 3D models. By postprocessing a DSM with Voronoi clustering [27] or with structure-aware mesh simplification [33], we obtain more compact meshes, but the building structure cannot be not restored. Our output model is both compact and structure-aware (see the low number of principal directions in the distribution of output normals).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we can see that over sloped roofs and within a larger block of buildings, the surface orientations vary too much, allowing the algorithm to produce good results on only one of the three inputs. Finally, we compare our method to structure-aware mesh decimation [Salinas et al 2015], which also produces good results, but only a part of the model is simplified.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another observed failure case occurs when roof gutters do not align to detected building-façade boundaries, as our optimization assumes such situations are noisy data. Finally, our core [Kazhdan et al 2006], Manhattan box fitting [Li et al 2016], Structure-Aware Mesh Decimation [Salinas et al 2015] and our technique (without GIS footprints or building-façade inputs).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And a min-cut formulation applied to a discrete approximation of a 3D planar arrangement for robust reconstruction. Salinas et al (2015) proposed a structure-aware mesh decimation method that mainly used to simplify dense surface meshes of complex buildings in urban scene. This approach takes as input a surface triangle mesh and a set of planar proxies pre-detected, and generates as output a simplified mesh where coarse-scale structures are preserved via an error metric and specific rules.…”
Section: Building Reconstruction From Oblique Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%