1984
DOI: 10.2307/413991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Use in the Acquisition of Word Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
109
1
6

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
109
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Dressler (2005), and consider that the acquisition of derivational morphology is an important step in mastering the complexity of lexical items (see also Schipke, Kauschke 2011). This process is interrelated with the issue of lexical knowledge as well as of lexical categories, since the central functions of derivation are change of meaning and transposition of word classes (Clark, Berman 1984, Ravid 2004. The cross-linguistic differences are expected to be considerable, being dependent on the role of derivation in the different languages (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dressler (2005), and consider that the acquisition of derivational morphology is an important step in mastering the complexity of lexical items (see also Schipke, Kauschke 2011). This process is interrelated with the issue of lexical knowledge as well as of lexical categories, since the central functions of derivation are change of meaning and transposition of word classes (Clark, Berman 1984, Ravid 2004. The cross-linguistic differences are expected to be considerable, being dependent on the role of derivation in the different languages (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The idea that Personal Agent occupies a more central position in the conceptual category Agent than Instrument is also confirmed by the facts of language acquisition. Clark and Hecht (1982) stress the primacy of Personal Agent with respect to Instrument in the acquisition of English -er nouns. This primacy is nicely illustrated by the following dialogue mentioned in their paper: Clark and Hecht (1982) also found that if a child used -er consistently for only one of its meanings, the majority used it consistently in its agent interpretation.…”
Section: Agents and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark and Hecht (1982) stress the primacy of Personal Agent with respect to Instrument in the acquisition of English -er nouns. This primacy is nicely illustrated by the following dialogue mentioned in their paper: Clark and Hecht (1982) also found that if a child used -er consistently for only one of its meanings, the majority used it consistently in its agent interpretation. Interestingly, the primacy of Personal Agent with respect to Instrument was also found by Clark and Berman (1984: 582-583) in their investigation of the acquisition of Hebrew morphology: 'In summary, coinages for agents and instruments suggest that speakers conceive of these two lexical classes as belonging to a single category, in which agents are more central than instruments'.…”
Section: Agents and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, language learning is viewed from the perspective of comprehension, which usually occurs before word production in typical development (e.g., Benedict, 1979;Clark & Berman, 1984), in language delay (Gibson & Ingram, 1983), and in apes (Savage-Rumbaugh, McDonald, Sevcik, Hopkins, & Rubert, 1986). In particular, I focus on learning names for things.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%