2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and magnetism of well defined cobalt nanoparticles embedded in a niobium matrix

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
68
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is well known that the bulk value is an overestimation of the particle magnetization in fine particle systems, due to strong surface and finite-size effects. 34,35 In our case, around 50-60 % of Co atoms are affected by the lowcoordination number at the surface, giving rise to smaller M S as compared to bulk Co. Consequently, this method leads to an underestimation of the average particle size 34,35 as compared to that obtained from TEM.…”
Section: A DC Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is well known that the bulk value is an overestimation of the particle magnetization in fine particle systems, due to strong surface and finite-size effects. 34,35 In our case, around 50-60 % of Co atoms are affected by the lowcoordination number at the surface, giving rise to smaller M S as compared to bulk Co. Consequently, this method leads to an underestimation of the average particle size 34,35 as compared to that obtained from TEM.…”
Section: A DC Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Luis et al 40 recently reported a size-dependent effective anisotropy constant of sputtered Co cluster in Al 2 O 3 that went down from 2.4ϫ 10 7 erg/ cm 3 for ͗D͘ = 0.8 nm to 3 ϫ 10 5 erg/ cm 3 for ͗D͘ = 5.2 nm and showed a linear dependence on the logarithm of the mean diameter. Jamet et al 34 report a slightly smaller effective anisotropy constant of 2 ϫ 10 6 erg/ cm 3 for Co particles with a 3-nm diameter in a niobium matrix. Our results are in good agreement with these experimental findings.…”
Section: B Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, previous structural studies 11,5 showed that one (resp. two) cobalt atomic layer diffuses inside the Pt (resp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Co/Nb multilayers are also used in superconducting spin valve devices 4 . For these reasons, a detailed study of Co clusters embedded in a superconducting niobium matrix is reported in a previous paper 5 . Though cobalt clusters have similar structures in Co/Pt and Co/Nb systems (a pure cobalt core and an alloyed interface), we observe that their magnetic properties are drastically different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic structure in nanoparticles can be changed pseudoepitaxially by embedding them in a matrix of a different material, thereby potentially offering a degree of control over their magnetism. Atomic structure change has been reported in Fe and Co nanoparticles embedded in various matrices [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. A convenient way of embedding nanoparticles in a matrix, directly from the gas phase, is provided by the low energy cluster beam deposition (LECBD) method [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%