The Prokaryotes 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30123-0_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Function of Microbial Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 347 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, other researchers who have studied the microbial consortia of rivers have concluded that river microbes generally are comparable to lake consortia [ 17 , 48 , 49 ]and we expected similar results. In addition, we expected to observe a number of sequences that reflected a “Microbial Loop” [ 50 ] as illustrated for another aquatic system [ 51 ], dominated by heterotrophic bacteria and including representatives of cyanobacteria and algae, protozoans, zooplankton (especially nematodes and cladocerans), insects, and vertebrates. Indeed, both of these expectations were supported, and we observed that approximately half of the most abundant read assignments corresponded to microbes identified as ecologically significant in lakes [ 23 ], fit the expected microbial functional patterns [ 50 ], and corresponded to the major groups of freshwater microbes previously described and summarized [ 24 ] namely: ultramicrobacteria (made up of three groups Polynucleobacter and other Betaproteobacteria , acI Actinobacteria , and certain Alphaproteobacteria ), opportunistic heterotrophs, phototrophs, and filamentous bacteria.…”
Section: Additional Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, other researchers who have studied the microbial consortia of rivers have concluded that river microbes generally are comparable to lake consortia [ 17 , 48 , 49 ]and we expected similar results. In addition, we expected to observe a number of sequences that reflected a “Microbial Loop” [ 50 ] as illustrated for another aquatic system [ 51 ], dominated by heterotrophic bacteria and including representatives of cyanobacteria and algae, protozoans, zooplankton (especially nematodes and cladocerans), insects, and vertebrates. Indeed, both of these expectations were supported, and we observed that approximately half of the most abundant read assignments corresponded to microbes identified as ecologically significant in lakes [ 23 ], fit the expected microbial functional patterns [ 50 ], and corresponded to the major groups of freshwater microbes previously described and summarized [ 24 ] namely: ultramicrobacteria (made up of three groups Polynucleobacter and other Betaproteobacteria , acI Actinobacteria , and certain Alphaproteobacteria ), opportunistic heterotrophs, phototrophs, and filamentous bacteria.…”
Section: Additional Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial mats are intricately organized structures that provide functional advantage to their inhabitants (e.g., Stahl et al, 2013 ). Mat architecture reflects both ecology and physiology in that it promotes the metabolisms of the microbes that construct the mat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although schematic models commonly depict cycles of individual elements, e.g., the carbon cycle, processes affecting the cycling of one element commonly also affect the cycling of other elements (Jelen et al, 2016). By driving the biotransformation of elements via their highly diverse and complex enzymatic machineries, biota, especially prokaryotic microbiota, are central to element cycling on Earth (Banfield et al, 2005;Stahl et al, 2013;Paul, 2014). During their >3500 Ma evolution, prokaryotes have developed genetic, physiological, metabolic and ecological capabilities, which allow them to live anywhere where water is available and ambient temperatures are below 121 ºC (Gogarten et al, 2002;Ramette and Tiedje, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%