Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there have been few studies which have suggested di¡erent hair cell functions in ¢shes, it now appears that the various hair cell types may have evolved for functional di¡erences in ¢shes as they have in amniotes (see Saidel et al 1995;Lanford & Popper 1996;Popper & Fay 1999, Lanford et al 2000. At the same time, far more work needs to be performed in order to fully correlate di¡erent ¢sh hair cell types with function, just as we need a good deal more work in order to understand the overall function of the sensory receptors in ¢shes.…”
Section: (D) Functional Signi¢cance Of Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been few studies which have suggested di¡erent hair cell functions in ¢shes, it now appears that the various hair cell types may have evolved for functional di¡erences in ¢shes as they have in amniotes (see Saidel et al 1995;Lanford & Popper 1996;Popper & Fay 1999, Lanford et al 2000. At the same time, far more work needs to be performed in order to fully correlate di¡erent ¢sh hair cell types with function, just as we need a good deal more work in order to understand the overall function of the sensory receptors in ¢shes.…”
Section: (D) Functional Signi¢cance Of Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auditory sensory epithelia of the lagena and utricle have two distinct populations of hair cells, one within a striola region and the other in an extrastriola zone. It has been demonstrated that striola hair cell ciliary bundles are ablated by gentamicin, while extrastriola bundles are relatively unaffected (Yan et al, 1991;Chang et al, 1992;Lanford et al, 2000). One possible explanation for our data is that the time courses of ototoxin-induced damage in the fish auditory end organs may be different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is therefore possible that this specific population of hair cells is responsible for transduction of acoustic pressure signals in the frequency range 300-600 Hz. Indeed, the caudal end of the goldfish saccule is tuned to lower frequencies compared with the rostral tip (Lanford et al, 2000). Also, the observation that thresholds expressed in particle motion units were not different in treated vs control fish between 300 and 600 Hz could indicate that a separate and distinct subset of saccular hair cells codes for acoustic pressure signals in this frequency range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, there is evidence to suggest that the primary auditory end organ in the oscar is the saccule, and behavioral studies have shown that this species hears sounds to no higher than 800 Hz (Yan and Popper, 1992). In contrast, otophysan fishes such as zebrafish (and related goldfish) are highly specialized for hearing, and can detect sounds to 4 kHz or above (reviewed in Fay, 1988;Lanford et al, 2000;Higgs et al, 2003). Hearing in these species involves a modified chain of vertebrae, the Weberian ossicles, which acoustically couples the pressure-detecting swim bladder to the saccule (Weber, 1820;Fay and Popper, 1985).…”
Section: Differences In Hair Cell Myosin VI Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%