Structure and Dynamics of a “T-Shaped” Knowledge: From Individuals to Cooperating Communities of Practice

Abstract

In a fast-changing environment, organizations face conditions of growing complexity that challenge decision-making and innovation activities, highlighting an increasing need to develop dynamic capabilities. In this scenario, our focus is on service science's recent call for “T-shaped professionals,” identified as people possessing both functional/disciplinary expertise and ability to apply knowledge across different contexts. Starting from this notion and by adopting a viable systems approach (vSa), we shift focus from individuals to organizations, providing an interpretation of the structure and dynamics of a “T-shaped knowledge” to be developed with respect to a distributed knowledge management network in which organizations pursue learning-by-interaction and knowledge cocreation. By integrating the vSa and the distributed knowledge management framework (DKMF), our proposal provides a multidimensional vSa-DKMF metamodel to assess the relational conditions among cooperating organizations as well as to provide guidelines for the construction of a knowledge network built on the idea of T-shaped knowledge. To illustrate the practical aspects of vSa-DKMF, we focus on the case of open communities of practice as an emblematic example of developing a T-shaped knowledge starting from a specialized (“I-shaped”) knowledge.

The Joint Influence of Intra- and Inter-Team Learning Processes on Team Performance: A Constructive or Destructive Combination?

“…The current study focuses on a university that had just initiated such an educational reform for all undergraduate study programs. The reform entailed a shift towards a more student-centred and project-based curriculum, which intends students to become 'T-shaped professionals': experts in their discipline, but at the same time capable of applying their knowledge in a broader context, in collaboration with other disciplines and with society (Barile et al 2012). In order to accomplish this, multidisciplinary teacher teams were formed to design new and larger courses, consisting of one central theme, with multiple content components and a joint project.…”

Rebuilding Evolution: A Service Science Perspective

“…However, future universities, without sacrificing knowledge depth, may be quite different. Reframed as test bed living labs that embrace general systems theory, universities could better prepare students as 'global citizens and adaptive innovators' with both depth and breadth, so-called-shaped professionals [29][30][31]. At the least, a multidisciplinary research perspective is required to develop the strategies, processes, training pedagogy and toolsets for lean engagement models that reduce integration overhead and that concomitantly prepare the next generation of service specialists (e.g.…”

Introducing the T-shaped model of cluster competence – an integrative framework and first empirical evidence from the German craftsmen sector

“…Thus, we combine the relational view with the resource-based view in the tradition of Hervas-Oliver, Sempere-Ripoll, and Boronat-Moll (2014) when deriving and illustrating our framework for an integrative model of cluster competence. Following the procedure of Barile et al (2012), we refer to the so called 'T-shaped manager' framework (Hansen and Oetinger 2001).…”