2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.11.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural variation of solid core and thickness of porous shell of 1.7μm core–shell silica particles on chromatographic performance: Narrow bore columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 28 ] So far, these core-shell silica particles have been prepared via the use of preformed nonporous silica particles followed by synthesizing a porous coating, [ 11 ] attaching smaller particles, [ 16 , 29 ] or the multiple step LbL technique. [27][28][29] A one-pot synthesis of core-shell particles would be highly advantageous, offering potential benefi ts on reaction time, easier quality control, materials costs, and process simplicity for facile scale-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 28 ] So far, these core-shell silica particles have been prepared via the use of preformed nonporous silica particles followed by synthesizing a porous coating, [ 11 ] attaching smaller particles, [ 16 , 29 ] or the multiple step LbL technique. [27][28][29] A one-pot synthesis of core-shell particles would be highly advantageous, offering potential benefi ts on reaction time, easier quality control, materials costs, and process simplicity for facile scale-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17), the Landauer diffusion model in Eqs. (21) and (22) or the Torquato's model Eqs. (48) and (49).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No fewer than three manufacturers are now competing to provide such packing materials including Halo (Advanced Material Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA), Kinetex (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), and Poroshell120 (Agilent Technologies, Little Falls, DE, USA). At least two academic groups are developing similar materials [21,22]. The performance of these columns is now equivalent to that of columns packed with sub-2 m particles over which they have the important advantages of requiring markedly lower operating pressures and exhibiting lesser efficiency loss due to thermal effects at high flow rates [10,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, extracolumn effects attributed to instrumentation that reduce the measured separation efficiency are more prominent than with standard HPLC columns [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Similar to previous eras when column technology began to exceed the limitations of commercial equipment [12,13], extra-column band broadening (ECBB) is now seeing increasing attention as an important factor that needs to be accounted for and reduced as much as possible [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%