1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-8545(00)82094-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural variability in solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinctive blue shifts, in contrast to the general trend of bond weakening in donor-acceptor complexation, 8 arise from alleviation of the antibonding characters of the C≡N and C-C bonds, which supplied from the lone electron-pair of the N atom. Especially the C≡N stretching band with its largest variation in vibrational characteristics has been used most often as a probe to determine the compositions of the solvation spheres, 1,2 electrophilicities of Lewis acids, 9,10 solvation numbers, [11][12][13][14][15][16] and acceptor or donor strengths of organic solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The distinctive blue shifts, in contrast to the general trend of bond weakening in donor-acceptor complexation, 8 arise from alleviation of the antibonding characters of the C≡N and C-C bonds, which supplied from the lone electron-pair of the N atom. Especially the C≡N stretching band with its largest variation in vibrational characteristics has been used most often as a probe to determine the compositions of the solvation spheres, 1,2 electrophilicities of Lewis acids, 9,10 solvation numbers, [11][12][13][14][15][16] and acceptor or donor strengths of organic solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The relationship between DE for the closed forms and solvent acceptor number and dielectric constant (or polarity) was explored, but no clear relationship was observed (see Supporting Information, Table S1). [27] In contrast a relatively good correlation (R 2 = 0.92) was observed between DE and the Guttmann solvent donor number ( Figure 6); DE decreases with increasing solvent donor strength. [27] The relationship between solvent donor number and DE indicates that a significant degree of stabilisation of the monocation 1 Hc + is achieved through solvation.…”
Section: Wwwchemeurjorgmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[27] In contrast a relatively good correlation (R 2 = 0.92) was observed between DE and the Guttmann solvent donor number ( Figure 6); DE decreases with increasing solvent donor strength. [27] The relationship between solvent donor number and DE indicates that a significant degree of stabilisation of the monocation 1 Hc + is achieved through solvation. As the solvent donor strength decreases, the electron density on the closed form Scheme 2.…”
Section: Wwwchemeurjorgmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Acceptor Absorption Emission [a] number [25] l - [b] [a] All are corrected values. The lifetime in different solvents is less than 0.1 ms.…”
Section: Solventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] When the transition energy (E abs ) of the absorption band and 3 MLCT emission energy (E em ) of the complex in different solvents were plotted against the Gutmans acceptor number (AN) [25] of a solvent, a linear relationship [16] was obtained ( Figure 5). In general, the higher the AN of a solvent is, the greater is the blue shift of the MLCT absorption band relative to that in solvents of lower AN; this result is due to the greater interaction between lone pair electrons on the nitrogen atoms of the cyano ligands and the solvent molecules of high AN, resulting in a lowering of s-donating ability as well as an increase in the p-acceptor ability of the …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%