Structural equation modeling of lean manufacturing practices in a developing country context

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine lean manufacturing (LM) practices and to quantify their impact on business performance (BP), with particular emphasis on the mediating role of operational performance (OP) in deriving the BP benefits commonly linked with LM. It also seeks to identify those lean practices most appropriate for application. Design/methodology/approach Empirical data on LM practices were collected using a structured survey questionnaire. The sampling frame was Jordanian companies registered and listed by the Amman Chamber of Commerce. In total, 500 questionnaires were distributed among 300 companies and a total of 249 completed questionnaires were eligible for statistical processing, a response rate of 49.8 percent. Invalid questionnaires were eliminated, leaving 228 usable. The theoretical relations were tested by structural equation modeling. Findings Although the results of the statistical analysis indicate a positive and significant impact of implementing LM practices on both OP and BP, they also show that the various LM practices did not receive equal recognition among the organizations surveyed. The most commonly adopted lean principles were found to be total preventive maintenance, statistical process control and housekeeping 5S. Research limitations/implications Other lean practices have not been considered as a dimension in this study. However, it opens new avenues of investigation relevant to lean practices. Practical implications The most significant implication of the study is that managers in manufacturing firms should place more emphasis on LM practices when developing strategies for leveraging performance. The study shows that the LM approach contributes to BP when LM practices are simultaneously implemented. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in the new context in which it was conducted. The study adds value by investigating the implementation of LM practices which have been transferred from developed to developing countries and by empirically examining their impact on key performance indicators within the Jordanian manufacturing sector.

The Effect of Lean Manufacturing on a Supply Chain Relationship and Performance

“…Zahraee [69] found that processes and equipment, planning and control, human resources, supplier relationships, and customer relations are significant practices for LM. Shrafat [70] recommended a LM framework for developing countries comprised of housekeeping 5s, single minute exchange of dies, total preventive maintenance, supplier just-in-time, pull production, continuous flow, and statistical process control. In this research, LM measures proposed by [5,11,71,72] were applied to frame the LM, construct consisting of purchasing and distribution, production, facility, and quality.…”

Lean manufacturing implementation in Zimbabwean industries: Impact on operational performance

“…Researchers such as Eswaramoorthi et al, 15 Khanchanapong et al, 22 Nawanir et al 24 and Marodin et al 53 have shown that the adoption of LM has given manufacturing companies a competitive edge through yielding positive results. Shrafat and Ismail 106 concluded that limited research has been conducted on LM in developing countries. Marodin et al 53 stated that developed countries often face difficulties to become Lean due to the changes in the market orientation.…”

Cleaner production practices at company level enhance the desire of employees to have a significant positive impact on society through work

“…However, we argue that lean manufacturing principles are primarily grounded on the philosophy of maximizing productivity by minimizing the ordeal of industrial waste ( Botti et al., 2017 ; Cortez et al., 2020 ; Maia et al., 2019 ; Thomas et al., 2018 ). Furthermore, we assert that although industrial waste can be minimized by implementing the lean manufacturing principles ( Andrade et al., 2020 ; Chauhan, 2016 ; Manfredsson, 2016 ; Shrafat and Ismail, 2019 ). Yet, the essence of organizational concern towards environment protection is much noteworthy in CPP ( Aranda-Usón et al., 2020 ; Cesar da Silva et al., 2021 ; de Oliveira et al., 2019 ; Ramos et al., 2021 ; Scarazzato et al., 2017 ) which makes former significantly less industrious in terms of our environmental safeguard measures ( Botti et al., 2017 ; Cong and Shi, 2019 ; Psomas and Antony, 2019 ; Salam and Farooq, 2020 ).…”