2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5023611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural, electronic, and dynamical properties of liquid water by ab initio molecular dynamics based on SCAN functional within the canonical ensemble

Abstract: We perform ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulation of liquid water in the canonical ensemble at ambient conditions using the strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) functional approximation and carry out systematic comparisons with the results obtained from the GGA-level Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional and Tkatchenko-Scheffler van der Waals (vdW) dispersion correction inclusive PBE functional. We analyze various properties of liquid wate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
73
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
6
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sharp contrast, the less structured water modeled by SCAN functional largely facilitates the water rotation and gives rise to much more reasonable values of τ 1 =4.08(±0.02) ps and D R =0.24 ps −1 , respectively. The result consists with previous studies on diffusion coefficient 27 . As a conclusion, the modified libration peak from the SCAN functional indicates an improved description of the diffusion related dynamics in liquid water.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In sharp contrast, the less structured water modeled by SCAN functional largely facilitates the water rotation and gives rise to much more reasonable values of τ 1 =4.08(±0.02) ps and D R =0.24 ps −1 , respectively. The result consists with previous studies on diffusion coefficient 27 . As a conclusion, the modified libration peak from the SCAN functional indicates an improved description of the diffusion related dynamics in liquid water.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The above can be attributed to the improved prediction of covalency in water monomer. Indeed, the better agreement with experiments by SCAN functional in terms of bond angle, bong length, and binding energies in single water molecule and water clusters in gas phase have been widely recognized recently 26,27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It resembles 47 the structure produced with the GGA functional of Becke 48 and Lee, Yang and Parr 49 (BLYP) with the Grimme dispersion correction (D2). 50 The origin of the discrepancy in comparison with previous SCAN studies 42,43 is likely due to the 30 K higher temperature used in these studies. This higher temperature was used to account for the effect of nuclear quantum effects.…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 61%
“…20 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that the SCAN functional significantly outperforms standard GGA functionals in reproducing bulk structural properties of ions in the condensed phase. As previously stated, earlier research has argued that SCAN can accurately reproduce bulk water structure 42,43 but this appears to require unphysically elevating the temperature by + 30 K. Similarly, the Na-Cl potential of mean force (PMF) in water has been computed with SCAN. 38 Different functionals may describe anion-water and cation-water interactions with signif-icantly different accuracy.…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, applying an active learning strategy with a PBE reference method and a slightly larger 3.5 Å cut-off generates excellent agreement with the true AIMD simulation from ref. 63 , in only a few hours of total training time (Figure 2d-f). The real significance, of course, is in moving to more accurate ground-truth methods, for which a full MD would not be straightforward: indeed, using the same method, a hybrid DFT-quality water model can be generated within a few days, which would be inaccessible with other methods (the generation of the GAP model required ~5 days on 20 CPU cores, Figure 2g-i).…”
Section: Water Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%