2016
DOI: 10.1038/nature20594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural basis of an essential interaction between influenza polymerase and Pol II CTD

Abstract: The heterotrimeric influenza polymerase (FluPol), comprising subunits PA, PB1 and PB2, binds to the conserved 5' and 3' termini (the 'promoter') of each of the eight single-stranded viral RNA (vRNA) genome segments and performs both transcription and replication of vRNA in the infected cell nucleus. To transcribe viral mRNAs, FluPol associates with cellular RNA polymerase II (Pol II), which enables it to take 5'-capped primers from nascent Pol II transcripts. Here we present a co-crystal structure of bat influ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
193
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
21
193
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although one cannot formally exclude that nucleoplasmic cap-snatching could occur (perhaps facilitated by active inhibition of the CBC complex by viral proteins or cellular decapping enzymes), chromatin targeting of viral polymerase via ChIP and the loss of signal in our RAP experiments in uncrosslinked cells favors the fact that the majority of cap snatching occurs on chromatin. In agreement with our results, a recent analysis indicates that the interaction of viral polymerase and RNAPII’s CTD is increased by phosphorylation of the CTD at its serine 5 position - a chemical mark mainly present at transcriptionally engaged RNAPII at promoters (Lukarska, et al 2017). Moreover, if cap-snatching could occur in the nucleoplasm, it’s hard to imagine why less cap-snatching occurs when more ncRNA caps are available upon exosome deficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although one cannot formally exclude that nucleoplasmic cap-snatching could occur (perhaps facilitated by active inhibition of the CBC complex by viral proteins or cellular decapping enzymes), chromatin targeting of viral polymerase via ChIP and the loss of signal in our RAP experiments in uncrosslinked cells favors the fact that the majority of cap snatching occurs on chromatin. In agreement with our results, a recent analysis indicates that the interaction of viral polymerase and RNAPII’s CTD is increased by phosphorylation of the CTD at its serine 5 position - a chemical mark mainly present at transcriptionally engaged RNAPII at promoters (Lukarska, et al 2017). Moreover, if cap-snatching could occur in the nucleoplasm, it’s hard to imagine why less cap-snatching occurs when more ncRNA caps are available upon exosome deficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…So how does the polymerase ‘switch’ from transcription (capped RNA primed) to replication (unprimed) at the same vRNA promoter? A plausible explanation is based on the fact that influenza polymerase is known to be associated with host Pol II CTD (50,51), which likely gives it access to nascent transcripts for pirating (52). It is thus possible that Pol II CTD sites become saturated as infection proceeds, due to both increasing numbers of polymerase complexes and decreasing amounts of Pol II resulting from degradation (53) and, in the absence of available primers, RNPs replicate de novo instead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Noteworthy in this context are the highresolution structures of influenza polymerase-the longelusive complex that the influenza virus uses to replicate and transcribe its genome [32][33][34][35]. Influenza polymerase consists of three subunits, PA, PB1 and PB2, with many functions, including cap-snatching and endonuclease activities.…”
Section: Accelerating Multiprotein Complex Structural Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flu polymerase structures. Crystal structures of MultiBac-produced polymerases of the three major influenza subtypes, fluA, fluB and fluC, have been determined [32][33][34][35]. For fluA and fluB, a polyprotein approach was used to balance stoichiometry.…”
Section: Fluamentioning
confidence: 99%