2014
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.594341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Basis for the Binding Specificity of Human Recepteur d'Origine Nantais (RON) Receptor Tyrosine Kinase to Macrophage-stimulating Protein

Abstract: Background: RON and MET receptors bind their ligands MSP and HGF selectively and activate different signaling pathways. Results: Crystallographic and analytical ultracentrifugation studies provide important information about RON-MSP interaction. Conclusion: RON-MSP and MET-HGF exhibit 2:2 complex stoichiometry, but differences within the respective interfaces explain the strict ligand-receptor specificity. Significance: Signaling pathways must be exquisitely regulated with no cross-reactivity between related s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to NK1, there is another Met-binding interface in the SP domain identified by a crystallographic analysis of a complex between the HGF SP and a fragment of Met comprising Sema and PSI domains 11 . The functional importance of this interface is validated by a mutagenesis study 12 , as well as by the fact that the same interface was found in the crystal structure of complex between the HGF homologue MSP and the Met homologue Ron 13 . Although HGF SP alone cannot activate Met 12 , a simultaneous addition of two HGF fragments, one encompassing N to K4 (called NK4 hereafter) and the other comprising SP, cooperatively activates Met 14 , indicating that the two binding segments can be reconstituted into an active ligand in the absence of the chain-connecting disufide bridge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition to NK1, there is another Met-binding interface in the SP domain identified by a crystallographic analysis of a complex between the HGF SP and a fragment of Met comprising Sema and PSI domains 11 . The functional importance of this interface is validated by a mutagenesis study 12 , as well as by the fact that the same interface was found in the crystal structure of complex between the HGF homologue MSP and the Met homologue Ron 13 . Although HGF SP alone cannot activate Met 12 , a simultaneous addition of two HGF fragments, one encompassing N to K4 (called NK4 hereafter) and the other comprising SP, cooperatively activates Met 14 , indicating that the two binding segments can be reconstituted into an active ligand in the absence of the chain-connecting disufide bridge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore only monomers of full length MSP are required to activate Ron and induce Ron homodimerization [38]. However, analytical ultracentrifugation and crystallographic studies reported by Chao et al revealed the presence of MSP:Ron complexes with a 2:2 stoichiometry [42]. These complexes were in relatively low abundance and had weaker binding affinity compared to the 1:1 and 1:2 complexes, but their presence suggests a possible role for MSP:MSP interaction within the Ron signaling complex although the physiological relevance is currently unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of computational alanine scanning reported here revealed that Glu 287 , Pro 288 , Glu 289 , and His 424 of RON located at the interface of RON-MSPb complex are crucial residues for its binding to MSPb. 76 According to ΔΔG values, Pro 288 , Glu 287 , and Glu 289 of RON are the next most important amino acids after Arg 220 (see Table 3). It seems that the importance of these residues is related to their interactions with more than one residues on MSP (except for Pro 288 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%