2013
DOI: 10.3390/ijms14011152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Phylogenetic Analysis of Rhodobacter capsulatus NifF: Uncovering General Features of Nitrogen-fixation (nif)-Flavodoxins

Abstract: Analysis of the crystal structure of NifF from Rhodobacter capsulatus and its homologues reported so far reflects the existence of unique structural features in nif flavodoxins: a leucine at the re face of the isoalloxazine, an eight-residue insertion at the C-terminus of the 50’s loop and a remarkable difference in the electrostatic potential surface with respect to non-nif flavodoxins. A phylogenetic study on 64 sequences from 52 bacterial species revealed four clusters, including different functional protot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(49 reference statements)
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained above, the circumstances under which proteins are introduced in in vivo or in vitro experiments (i.e., full-length sequence versus growing polypeptide) differ considerably. Though in some cases chemically or sequentially truncated versions of proteins have been studied for their folding behaviour (21)(22)(23)(24), these experiments do not take into account the other major differences between in vivo and in vitro circumstances. As the lifetimes of proteins in cells can range from minutes to years (25) there is ample time for multiple folding rounds for fully synthesized protein.…”
Section: Differences Between Folding In Vivo and In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As explained above, the circumstances under which proteins are introduced in in vivo or in vitro experiments (i.e., full-length sequence versus growing polypeptide) differ considerably. Though in some cases chemically or sequentially truncated versions of proteins have been studied for their folding behaviour (21)(22)(23)(24), these experiments do not take into account the other major differences between in vivo and in vitro circumstances. As the lifetimes of proteins in cells can range from minutes to years (25) there is ample time for multiple folding rounds for fully synthesized protein.…”
Section: Differences Between Folding In Vivo and In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they predominantly locate in the N-terminal part of multi-domain proteins this protection against degradation and aggregation may be an important factor during cotranslational folding of these proteins. One such example is the group of P450 fusion proteins, in which the N-terminal domain is in all but one case either a heme-binding P450 or a flavin-binding domain (23).…”
Section: Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations