2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2013.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and optical properties of new cyclometalated Ru(II) derived compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ru–N bond lengths involving the two bipyridine ligands and the bridging ligand are within the normal range (2.04–2.07 Å) of what is expected for such bonds in [Ru(bpy) 2 (phenanthroline)] 2+ type complexes. 102 , 103 The Cu–N distances are 2.00–2.06 Å, in good agreement with bond lengths reported for related mononuclear CuHETPHEN complexes. 66 , 70 , 71 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Ru–N bond lengths involving the two bipyridine ligands and the bridging ligand are within the normal range (2.04–2.07 Å) of what is expected for such bonds in [Ru(bpy) 2 (phenanthroline)] 2+ type complexes. 102 , 103 The Cu–N distances are 2.00–2.06 Å, in good agreement with bond lengths reported for related mononuclear CuHETPHEN complexes. 66 , 70 , 71 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is well-known that, in a simplified picture, the highest occupied orbitals in a pseudo-octahedral Ru­(II) polypyridyl complex mainly consist of the ruthenium t 2g d orbitals while the lowest occupied orbitals typically correspond to π* orbitals localized on the ligands. , Therefore, the lowest intense absorption band is expected to be of metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) character stemming from electronic transitions from the t 2g manifold to the empty ligand lowest-lying orbitals and leading to the population of a singlet state of MLCT nature under light irradiation. A simple way to red shift the MLCT absorption energy is, therefore, to decrease the HOMO–LUMO gap by an ad-hoc functionalization of the ligands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the TD‐DFT method is appropriate for describing lowest electronic excited states in a number of second‐ and third‐row transition metal complexes its use for first‐row transition metal complexes is more questionable . Indeed, describing on the same footing MLCT and MC excited states is a real challenge for computational chemistry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%