2016
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.129.1220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Optical Properties of Nanostructured Fe-Doped SnO2

Abstract: Nanocrystalline Sn1−xFexO2 (where x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.04) powders have been successfully synthesized by the hydrothermal method followed by sintering at 1000• C for 3 h. The morphology and structure of the samples have been analyzed by field emission scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction, respectively. X-ray diffraction results revealed that all diffraction peaks positions agree well with the reflection of a tetragonal rutile structure of SnO2 phase without extra peaks. The formation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FT-IR peak intensity decreased, and peak broadening occurred after the NiO = content was increased on the SnO 2 surface. It suggests the defect formation in the materials according to the reported literature …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FT-IR peak intensity decreased, and peak broadening occurred after the NiO = content was increased on the SnO 2 surface. It suggests the defect formation in the materials according to the reported literature …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It suggests the defect formation in the materials according to the reported literature. 34 The surface morphologies determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of SnO 2 and NiO show an irregular morphology with variable particle size (Figure 2a,b). The SEM image of nanostructured NiO(10%)/SnO 2 suggests that the surface coverage of SnO 2 took place with finely dispersed NiO nanoparticles (Figure 2c) and the NiO loading on the SnO 2 surface did not make any changes in the surface morphology of SnO 2 .…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 42 ] The bands at 1646 and 3394 cm −1 correspond to an OH group's vibration and deformation frequency because the synthesis is water‐based. [ 31 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Raman spectrum of the NiSnO 3 and FeSnO 3 (Figure 3i) show major bands at 620 and 570 cm −1, referring to the OSnO and OFeO vibrations, respectively. [29,31] IR bands located at 306, 519, 678, and 750 cm −1 arise from the SnO, NiO, NiO, and OSnO vibrations, respectively in the NiSnO 3 structure. In the FeSnO 3 structure, the broadband at 1310 cm −1 is attributed to the second-order scattering of hematite.…”
Section: Morphological and Structural Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decrease in crystal size of SnO 2 as the Cu-doping level increases suggesting that the growth was suppressed due to doping of Cu 2+ ion into Sn site. This can be attributed to the incorporation of Cu 2+ ion in the host lattice to create more nucleation sites which would increase the lattice strain by slowing down the growth of the crystals [37,39]. The density of dislocation (δ = 1/D 2 ) [35,40], where D is the crystallite size from Scherrer's formula, caused by the microstructural strain and other defects seen to increase as Cu-doping increased in the host lattice (Figure 3(b)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%