2010
DOI: 10.1021/ic902094c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Luminescence Studies on π···π and Pt···Pt Interactions in Mixed Chloro-Isocyanide Cyclometalated Platinum(II) Complexes

Abstract: [Pt(bzq)Cl(CNR)] [bzq = benzoquinolinate; R = tert-butyl ((t)Bu 1), 2-6-dimethylphenyl (Xyl 2), 2-naphthyl (2-Np 3)] complexes have been synthesized and structurally and photophysically characterized. 1 was found to co-crystallize in two distinct pseudopolymorphs: a red form, which exhibits an infinite 1D-chain ([1](infinity)) and a yellow form, which contains discrete dimers ([1](2)), both stabilized by interplanar pi...pi (bzq) and short Pt...Pt bonding interactions. Complex 3, generated through the unexpect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(140 reference statements)
8
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UV–visible absorption spectra in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solution of the Aliz series 4 – 7 are shown in Figure . All the cyclometalated complexes 4 – 6 displayed intense bands in the UV region between 280 and 330 nm assigned to the allowed 1 LC(π–π*) transitions localized on the PhPy, ThPy and Bzq ligands . The low‐energy absorption bands between 330 and 650 nm of 4 – 7 were instead attributed to a mixed (metal–ligand charge transfer (MLCT)–ligand‐centred (LC)) character, which predominantly involved the chelating ligand, in agreement with the experimental and theoretical electronic spectra of the Aliz molecule …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The UV–visible absorption spectra in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solution of the Aliz series 4 – 7 are shown in Figure . All the cyclometalated complexes 4 – 6 displayed intense bands in the UV region between 280 and 330 nm assigned to the allowed 1 LC(π–π*) transitions localized on the PhPy, ThPy and Bzq ligands . The low‐energy absorption bands between 330 and 650 nm of 4 – 7 were instead attributed to a mixed (metal–ligand charge transfer (MLCT)–ligand‐centred (LC)) character, which predominantly involved the chelating ligand, in agreement with the experimental and theoretical electronic spectra of the Aliz molecule …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This feature is akin to that of Pt(II) complexes with severe aggregation in the solid state, particularly to those with a 1D infinite‐chain‐like stacking arrangement . Thus, we can confidently assign this lowest energy emission to MMLCT, for which the packing arrangement is probably switching from the single Pt(II) complex and/or Pt 3 trimer to the infinite metal chain‐like structure which is stabilized by the formation of chain‐like Pt⋯Pt interaction after rinsing with acetone. Moreover, the formation of a red‐emitting solid can be also achieved using solvents such as THF, CHCl 3 , DMF, and methanol, confirming its link to the solvent polarity in altering the stacking interaction in the solid state.…”
Section: Overview On Homoleptic Pt(ii) Complexesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The trinuclear “Pt 2 Tl” units rearrange in the crystal generating two-dimensional (2D) networks through additional stabilizing contacts. On one hand, the “Pt 2 Tl” units stack through intermolecular Pt···Pt (3.340 Å, 3.310 Å 2A ; 3.401 Å, 3.240 Å 2B ) interactions and weak π–π contacts between the NHC and the acac ligands (the shortest atomic separation between two neighboring units is 3.467 Å 2A ; 3.429 Å 2B , see Figures b and b), giving rise to almost linear PtB–Tl–PtA··PtA–Tl–PtB···PtB wires in 2A [angles: PtB–Tl–PtA: 169.813°, Tl–PtA··PtA: 158.77°, Tl–PtB···PtB: 165.32°] and zigzag chains in 2B [angles: PtB–Tl–PtA: 145.512°, Tl–PtA··PtA: 177.80°, Tl–PtB···PtB: 160.07°]. These chains appear linked together through two additional Tl–E (E′) (E, E′ = N 2A , O 2B ) bonds with the R substituents of the R–C^C* groups (R= CN 2A , CO 2 Et 2B ) belonging to the two adjacent chains (see Figures c and c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%