2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.184512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong enhancement of superconductivity at high pressures within the charge-density-wave states of2HTaS2and2HTaSe2

Abstract: We present measurements of the superconducting and charge-density-wave (CDW) critical temperatures (T c and T CDW ) as a function of pressure in the transition metal dichalchogenides 2H -TaSe 2 and 2H -TaS 2 . Resistance and susceptibility measurements show that T c increases from temperatures below 1 K up to 8.5 K at 9.5 GPa in 2H -TaS 2 and 8.2 K at 23 GPa in 2H -TaSe 2 . We observe a kink in the pressure dependence of T CDW at about 4 GPa that we attribute to the lock-in transition from incommensurate CDW t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
8
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23,37,38 Assuming similar bulk modulus to WSe 2 (72 GPa), 39 the estimated chemical pressure differences of 2H-TaSeS (T c = 3.7 K) when compared with 2H-TaSe 2 (T c = 0.14 K) and 2H-TaS 2 (T c = 0.8 K) are 6 GPa (positive pressure/contraction) and 2.8 GPa (negative pressure/expansion). Positive pressure increases considerably superconducting T c in both 2H-TaS 2 and 2H-TaS 2 ; 6 GPa brings T c in 2H-TaSe 2 up to about 3 K. 40 CDW is robust, surviving up to 20 GPa (2H-TaSe 2 ) and up to 16 GPa (2H-TaS 2 ). Clearly, chemical pressure may influence the rise of superconducting T c in S-doped 2H-TaSe 2 , but it cannot explain the absence of CDW in high-T c samples in the phase diagram (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…23,37,38 Assuming similar bulk modulus to WSe 2 (72 GPa), 39 the estimated chemical pressure differences of 2H-TaSeS (T c = 3.7 K) when compared with 2H-TaSe 2 (T c = 0.14 K) and 2H-TaS 2 (T c = 0.8 K) are 6 GPa (positive pressure/contraction) and 2.8 GPa (negative pressure/expansion). Positive pressure increases considerably superconducting T c in both 2H-TaS 2 and 2H-TaS 2 ; 6 GPa brings T c in 2H-TaSe 2 up to about 3 K. 40 CDW is robust, surviving up to 20 GPa (2H-TaSe 2 ) and up to 16 GPa (2H-TaS 2 ). Clearly, chemical pressure may influence the rise of superconducting T c in S-doped 2H-TaSe 2 , but it cannot explain the absence of CDW in high-T c samples in the phase diagram (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Generally low superconducting critical temperatures prevents any Raman spectroscopy study of the SC state. In 2H-TaS 2 , an incommensurate CDW develops below 77 K followed by a superconducting state below T c =1 K. Recent reports [40] have shown a dramatic increase in T c with pressure, up to 8.5 K at 10 GPa. Then an observation of the coexisting superconducting and CDW states, and of the Higgs mode, becomes accessible using Raman scattering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This structure, sometimes observed in simple superconductors [51] and here observed up to 9.5 GPa in the pure superconducting state, is the expected incoherent Cooper-pair breaking peak (CPBP). At the highest measured pressure (9.5 GPa), the SC transition has already reached its maximum of 8.5 K [40]. By calculating the theoretical Raman response (purple line in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a different scenario for the interplay of CDW and SC is the occurrence of a superconducting dome on the edge of a CDW/structural instability, as proposed for T Se 2 (T = Ti, and Ta) [1,2,10,11], Lu(Pt 1−x Pd x ) 2 In [3], o-TaS 3 [12] and (Ca,Sr) 3 Ir 4 Sn 13 [13]. SC in conjunction with non-Fermi liquid behaviors is often found in close proximity to a magnetically ordered phase in strongly correlated electronic systems, such as heavy fermion compounds, high T c cuprates, and iron-based superconductors [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%