2014
DOI: 10.1080/1081602x.2014.897246
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong and weak family ties revisited: reconsidering European family structures from a network perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
30
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…When we examine the regional variation in the effects of parental family size on children's family size, no pattern emerges that follows any cultural divide between strong and weak family regions (compare with Reher, ; Mönkediek & Bras, ). Instead, in nearly all countries, significant within‐country variations can be observed in transmission strength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When we examine the regional variation in the effects of parental family size on children's family size, no pattern emerges that follows any cultural divide between strong and weak family regions (compare with Reher, ; Mönkediek & Bras, ). Instead, in nearly all countries, significant within‐country variations can be observed in transmission strength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indicators constitute the basic opportunity structure for intergenerational interaction, and their combination can be assumed to reflect obligations and emotional associations between kin (Hank, : 158; Viazzo, : 282–283). By aggregating the individual scores to the NUTS 2 level, we can learn about the family system in which each respondent lives (Mönkediek & Bras, ). Strong family regions are, for example, identified by a higher than average score on contact or distance between kin.…”
Section: Data Measures and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In strong family regions, family members are more likely to share the same family norms and values and be able to enforce them more easily, which results in more commonly agreed upon family organization principles. In weak family regions, social networks contain a greater variety of relationships with both kin and non-kin (Höllinger & Haller 1990;Mönkediek & Bras 2014) and a greater spatial dispersion between kin is observed (Viazzo 2010b, 147). This greater dispersion is often connected with a more generous welfare state, which allows for greater intergenerational transfers of resources and reduces the need for kin co-residence (Albertini & Kohli 2013).…”
Section: Regional Family Systems and Variance In Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, the issue of kinship has become extremely prominent in historical and sociological studies that have started to re-conceptualise the notion of traditional kinship systems and to explore the implications they have for value formation and interpersonal relationships in the modern context (see, for example, Heady and Kohli 2010;Heady and Schweitzer 2010;Kertzer 1984;Mönkediek 2016;Mönkediek and Bras 2014;Reher 1998). This line of research suggests that although the organisation of household, and co-residence and inheritance patterns, aka traditional kinship systems, may change quickly, family relationships and underlying values behind these traditions are more systematic.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%