1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(199603)22:3<217::aid-syn3>3.3.co;2-i
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Striatal and cortical NMDA receptors are altered by a neurotoxic regimen of methamphetamine
Abstract: Methamphetamine (m-AMPH) treatment produces long-lasting damage to striatal and cortical monoaminergic terminals and may also injure nonmonoaminergic cortical neurons. Evidence suggests that both dopamine (DA) and glutamate (GLU) play crucial roles in producing this damage. We used quantitative autoradiography to examine [3H]mazindol ([3H]MAZ) binding to striatal DA transporters and [3H]GLU binding to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the striatum and cortex 1 week and 1 month after a neurotoxic regimen…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
9
6
3
0
Citation Types
0
21
0
0
Year Published
1998
2017
Publication Types
Select...
16
Relationship
4
12
Authors
Journals
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
21
0
0
“…DA nerve endings in the NAc are much more resistant to the damaging effects of METH by comparison to the CPu. METH-induced reductions in NAc DA levels are 20-40% of what is seen in CPu (Morgan and Gibb 1980;O'Dell et al 1991;Sabol et al 2001;Wallace et al 2001;Davidson et al 2007) while DAT binding sites (Eisch et al 1992(Eisch et al , 1996 and TH activity (Haughey et al 1999) are not changed in the NAc. The METH-induced formation of high molecular weight DAT complexes that occurs in CPu (Baucum et al 2004) does not occur in the NAc (Hadlock et al 2009), and a non-toxic METH dosing regimen that induces behavioral sensitization lowers DAT density in CPu but not in the NAc (Bjorklund et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…DA nerve endings in the NAc are much more resistant to the damaging effects of METH by comparison to the CPu. METH-induced reductions in NAc DA levels are 20-40% of what is seen in CPu (Morgan and Gibb 1980;O'Dell et al 1991;Sabol et al 2001;Wallace et al 2001;Davidson et al 2007) while DAT binding sites (Eisch et al 1992(Eisch et al , 1996 and TH activity (Haughey et al 1999) are not changed in the NAc. The METH-induced formation of high molecular weight DAT complexes that occurs in CPu (Baucum et al 2004) does not occur in the NAc (Hadlock et al 2009), and a non-toxic METH dosing regimen that induces behavioral sensitization lowers DAT density in CPu but not in the NAc (Bjorklund et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It has been proposed that the long-term effects of Meth depend on the amount of overflow of DA induced by the drug (O'Dell et al 1991), and, in agreement, it has been shown that Meth-induced damage is prevented by inhibition of DA synthesis (Gibb and Kogan 1979;Hotchkiss and Gibb 1980;, DA transport Marek et al 1990), or even by DA receptor antagonism (Sonsalla et al 1986;O'Dell et al 1993). It has been argued, however, that Meth may also increase glutamate (Glu) overflow (Sonsalla et al 1989;Nash and Yamamoto 1992;Stephans and Yamamoto 1994), leading to the hypothesis that there is a synergism between both DA and Glu release, and that this is a requirement for Meth-induced neurotoxicity (Abekawa et al 1994;Eisch et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This effect is perhaps due to a decrease in DA transport (Eisch et al 1996;Fleckenstein et al 1997), required for Meth to be taken up to elicit its effect on DA terminals (Marek et al 1990). The most striking effect of repeated Meth was, however, on K + -evoked inhibitory (GABA) and excitatory (Glu, Asp) amino acid levels, which were increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Schwendt et al (2009) recently showed that repeated long-access self-administration of mAMPH led to a down-regulation of DAT rather than neurotoxicity, the single-day binge mAMPH regimen used in the present experiments has been shown to produce long-lasting decreases in striatal DA content (Eisch et al, 1992), binding of two different radioligands to striatal DAT (Belcher et al, 2005;Eisch et al, 1996;Schröder et al, 2003), and striatal TH immunoreactivity (Eisch et al, 1996). Thus, we interpret the present decreases in striatal DA markers as representing injury to DA terminals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
