2016
DOI: 10.1364/optica.3.001285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-state manipulation in fused silica via femtosecond laser irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
82
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative sign of the topology variation is indicative of a volume reduction (and hence a density increase) in the irradiated area, and is the opposite to what happens when microprocessing is performed in the type 2 regime, with longer (35 fs) and more energetic (about 2 µJ) laser pulses where surface swelling as high as 250 nm was measured [6]. An inversion in the sign of the surface topography is consistent with recent observations reporting a volume reduction of glass cantilevers irradiated in the type 1 regime and a net volume increase of cantilevers irradiated in the type 2 regime [4]. We emphasize that the absence of material re-deposition in the AFM pictures hints towards a purely non-ablative process.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative sign of the topology variation is indicative of a volume reduction (and hence a density increase) in the irradiated area, and is the opposite to what happens when microprocessing is performed in the type 2 regime, with longer (35 fs) and more energetic (about 2 µJ) laser pulses where surface swelling as high as 250 nm was measured [6]. An inversion in the sign of the surface topography is consistent with recent observations reporting a volume reduction of glass cantilevers irradiated in the type 1 regime and a net volume increase of cantilevers irradiated in the type 2 regime [4]. We emphasize that the absence of material re-deposition in the AFM pictures hints towards a purely non-ablative process.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The spectra were normalized with respect to the amplitude of the ω3 band [28]. They reveal an increase of the D2 peak (centered at 600 cm −1 ) in the irradiated volume, confirming a local laser-induced compaction [3,4]. These micro-Raman measurements were carried out on the top surface of the sample and might not necessarily correspond to the maximum of compaction, presumably located in the center of the laser-induced microstructure (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These values are in fairly good agreement with the measured values (∼142 nm and ∼72 nm, respectively), although a bit lower in magnitude for SiO 2 . This can be attributed to the stress field contribution associated with the formed nanoplanes [80]. Moreover, it appears that the R values between core and cladding principally differ due to their different laser track lengths, but the calculated form birefringence values from the nanostructures opto-geometrical parameters (see table 2) are somewhat similar (∼6.3×10 −3 in SiO 2 versus ∼5.3×10 −3 in YAS).…”
Section: Laser Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The unit cell of a graphene ribbon consists of six sites as sketched in figure 1(a), where each waveguide is separated from its NN by a center-to-center distance 'a'. The interaction between lattice sites is governed by the evanescent coupling which decreases exponentially with the distance between waveguides [12,13]. We define the nearest and next-NN coupling coefficients in figure 1(b), where the horizontal coupling is V 1 , the shortdiagonal one is V 2 , the vertical coefficient is V 3 , and the long-diagonal one is V 4 .…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%