1993
DOI: 10.1017/s0263034600004924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengths and weaknesses of KrF lasers for inertial confinement fusion applications learned from the AURORA laser

Abstract: The AURORA KrF laser at Los Alamos became operational in August 1989. AURORA is the first integrated system for demonstrating the capability of a KrF laser to perform target physics experiments for inertial confinement fusion (ICF) and is currently configured as a 5-kJ, 5-ns, 96-beam device. Both laser physics and ICF target physics experiments have been performed over the last year. Of the four major amplifiers in the AURORA laser system, one performed better than expected, one performed about as expected, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…laser-plasma interaction during the past two decades at 0.1-10.0 kJ-class single-shot KrF facilities AURORA (Los Alamos National Laboratory; LANL) (Rosocha et al, 1986(Rosocha et al, , 1987Harris et al, 1993), NIKE Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) (Obenschain et al, 1996;Pawley et al, 1997Pawley et al, , 1999Aglitskiy et al, 2002), SPRITE (RAL) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (Shaw et al, 1993(Shaw et al, , 1999Divall et al, 1996), ASHURA National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIS & T) (Owadano et al, 1989(Owadano et al, , 1993(Owadano et al, , 1999(Owadano et al, , 2001 and GARPUN Lebedev Physical Institute (LPI) (Basov et al, 1993;Zvorykin & Lebo, 1999;Zvorykin et al, 2001Zvorykin et al, , 2004Zvorykin et al, , 2006aWang et al, 2002), and especially at rep-rate Electra laser (NRL) (Sethian et al, 1998Wolford et al, 2006) have proved that e-beam-pumped KrF laser might be the best challenge for direct-drive ICF power plant. To satisfy physical and economical requirements, they should be scaled to output energies of 30-60 kJ per one module, operating all together with the total laser energy of $2 MJ at rep-rate of 5 Hz and overall system efficiency of 7.5% (Svyatoslavsky et al, 1992;Von Rosenberg, 1992;McGeoch et al, 1997;Sethian et al, 2003).…”
Section: Krf Drivers In the Fast-ignition Icf Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…laser-plasma interaction during the past two decades at 0.1-10.0 kJ-class single-shot KrF facilities AURORA (Los Alamos National Laboratory; LANL) (Rosocha et al, 1986(Rosocha et al, , 1987Harris et al, 1993), NIKE Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) (Obenschain et al, 1996;Pawley et al, 1997Pawley et al, , 1999Aglitskiy et al, 2002), SPRITE (RAL) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (Shaw et al, 1993(Shaw et al, , 1999Divall et al, 1996), ASHURA National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIS & T) (Owadano et al, 1989(Owadano et al, , 1993(Owadano et al, , 1999(Owadano et al, , 2001 and GARPUN Lebedev Physical Institute (LPI) (Basov et al, 1993;Zvorykin & Lebo, 1999;Zvorykin et al, 2001Zvorykin et al, , 2004Zvorykin et al, , 2006aWang et al, 2002), and especially at rep-rate Electra laser (NRL) (Sethian et al, 1998Wolford et al, 2006) have proved that e-beam-pumped KrF laser might be the best challenge for direct-drive ICF power plant. To satisfy physical and economical requirements, they should be scaled to output energies of 30-60 kJ per one module, operating all together with the total laser energy of $2 MJ at rep-rate of 5 Hz and overall system efficiency of 7.5% (Svyatoslavsky et al, 1992;Von Rosenberg, 1992;McGeoch et al, 1997;Sethian et al, 2003).…”
Section: Krf Drivers In the Fast-ignition Icf Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%