2013
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengths and limitations of microarray-based phenotype prediction: lessons learned from the IMPROVER Diagnostic Signature Challenge

Abstract: The lung cancer dataset is available from Gene Expression Omnibus (accession, GSE43580). The maPredictDSC R package implementing the approach of the best overall team is available at www.bioconductor.org or http://bioinformaticsprb.med.wayne.edu/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
96
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied the approach comparable used by the best performing team of the IMPROVER DSC. 38,39 The 5-fold cross-validation performance of this model reached Sp ¼ 0.96 and Se ¼ 0.93 in predicting smokers versus NS; slightly above the performance of models based on the core and extended signatures.…”
Section: Exposure Signature Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We applied the approach comparable used by the best performing team of the IMPROVER DSC. 38,39 The 5-fold cross-validation performance of this model reached Sp ¼ 0.96 and Se ¼ 0.93 in predicting smokers versus NS; slightly above the performance of models based on the core and extended signatures.…”
Section: Exposure Signature Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, despite the success of the IMPRO-VER Diagnostic Signature Challenge (DSC), the development of computational methodologies that can be robust and versatile in clinical applications remains challenging. 38,39 The aim of the present study was to identify a whole blood-based gene signature for current smokers (CS) with the potential to distinguish between subjects who smoked and those who had stopped smoking (former smokers (FS)) or never smoked (nonsmokers (NS)). Taking advantage of the lessons learnt from the IMPROVER DSC, we developed a new methodology based on a prediction model that uses high fold-change genes extracted from several publicly available gene expression datasets that profiled samples from CS and NS or FS in the same tissue of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-sample t test or paired-sample t test according to experimental design was employed as differential expression calling method, followed by the Benjamini-Hochberg (FDR) adjustment. For verifying expression correlation between genes, Pearson correlation analysis was used after CEL files from GSE43580 (27) and GSE31210 (28) were downloaded and normalized by RMA.…”
Section: Flow Cytometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain tissues were collected at 30 month, while brain tissues from 5-month-old mice fed the control diet were also collected and served as young controls. Identification of the transcriptional signature was done using an enhanced version of a rank-based classification method described in the Supplementary Material (Lauria 2013;Tarca et al 2013;Lauria et al 2015).…”
Section: Enhanced Network-based Analysis: Combining Network and Signmentioning
confidence: 99%