2016
DOI: 10.4193/rhino15.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratification of SNOT-22 scores into mild, moderate or severe and relationship with other subjective instruments

Abstract: Aims and objectives: The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps provides treatment algorithms based on the mild/moderate/severe (MMS) classification. To date there has been no statistically validated stratification of the SNOT-22 score according to this classification. Methods: 65 consecutive patients diagnosed with CRS completed a SNOT-22, VAS and rated their symptoms according to MMS and impact on quality of life. Results: The median SNOT 22 scores varied between the 3 MMS categories. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Disposition of patients is illustrated in Figure3.Of the 67 enrolled patients, 35 (52.2%) were male and 37 (55.2%) were diagnosed with bilateral nasal polyps by endoscopy, each representing approximately half the patients in each study arm. All patients reported moderateto-severe CRS symptoms17 at baseline, with a mean ± standard deviation SNOT-22 score of 68.2 ± 18.4 (range, 25-107) and a 4CS score of 9.7 ± 1.59 (range, 7-12). In addition, all patients exhibited sinonasal inflammation based on their baseline Zinreich scores (mean, 20.3 ± 12.3 [median 17; range, 1-53]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disposition of patients is illustrated in Figure3.Of the 67 enrolled patients, 35 (52.2%) were male and 37 (55.2%) were diagnosed with bilateral nasal polyps by endoscopy, each representing approximately half the patients in each study arm. All patients reported moderateto-severe CRS symptoms17 at baseline, with a mean ± standard deviation SNOT-22 score of 68.2 ± 18.4 (range, 25-107) and a 4CS score of 9.7 ± 1.59 (range, 7-12). In addition, all patients exhibited sinonasal inflammation based on their baseline Zinreich scores (mean, 20.3 ± 12.3 [median 17; range, 1-53]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final dataset included SNOT‐22 results from 800 CRS patients. The mean ± SD total SNOT‐22 score of these patients was 36.2 ± 21.9, thus representing a CRS cohort with, on average, moderate disease severity 36 . The overall proportion of No problem responses ranged from 16% to 76%; Very mild problem ranged from 10% to 27%; Mild or slight problem ranged from 6% to 20%; Moderate problem ranged from 5% to 26%; Severe problem ranged from 2% to 21%; and Problem as bad as it can be ranged from 1% to 12%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores indicate a greater rhinosinusitis‐related health burden, 22 , 23 with classifications of mild disease based on scores of 8–17, moderate 22.5–48, and severe 54–83. 24 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Due to multiple comparisons, a Bonferroni correction was applied and the significance level was set at p < .003. Difference between classifications of SNOT‐22 total scores (mild, moderate, and severe), 24 sputum color (mucoid, mucopurulent, and purulent), presence or absence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization, and classifications of bronchiectasis severity (based on BSI) were analyzed using Chi square. Statistical significance was set at an α < .05 unless otherwise stated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%