2020
DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for reducing per‐sample costs in target capture sequencing for phylogenomics and population genomics in plants

Abstract: Citation: Hale, H., E. M. Gardner, J. Viruel, L. Pokorny, and M. G. Johnson. 2020. Strategies for reducing per-sample costs in target capture sequencing for phylogenomics and population genomics in plants. Applications in Plant Sciences 8(4): e11337.The reduced cost of high-throughput sequencing and the development of gene sets with wide phylogenetic applicability has led to the rise of sequence capture methods as a plausible platform for both phylogenomics and population genomics in plants. An important consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We sampled 56 out of 66 species (and all genera) in Moreae as well as select outgroup taxa from Artocarpeae using DNA from leaf tissue preserved on silica gel or-in most cases-samples from herbarium specimens (Table S1). In either case, DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method, usually with increased incubation times to maximize yield from herbarium tissue (Doyle & Doyle, 1987;Hale & al., 2020). Samples were quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, California, USA), and herbarium samples were run on a gel to test for degradation.…”
Section: Taxon Sampling Library Preparation and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sampled 56 out of 66 species (and all genera) in Moreae as well as select outgroup taxa from Artocarpeae using DNA from leaf tissue preserved on silica gel or-in most cases-samples from herbarium specimens (Table S1). In either case, DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method, usually with increased incubation times to maximize yield from herbarium tissue (Doyle & Doyle, 1987;Hale & al., 2020). Samples were quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, California, USA), and herbarium samples were run on a gel to test for degradation.…”
Section: Taxon Sampling Library Preparation and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target enrichment was carried out using the MyBaits Angiosperms353 universal probe set (Däicel Arbor Biosciences, Ann Arbor, MI; (Johnson et al, 2019)). Target enrichment followed the modifications to the manufacturer's protocol outlined in (Hale et al, 2020); i.e., pool of 20-24 samples and RNA baits diluted to ¼ concentration). Unenriched DNA library was added to the cleaned, target enriched pool to increase the amount of off-target, chloroplast fragments in the sequencing library.…”
Section: Dna Extraction Library Prep Target Enrichment and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, several methods have been developed to reduce the cost and effort required to obtain genomic information in novel species (McKain et al, 2018). The recent development of targeted sequence capture presents an affordable method for consistently isolating specific, long, phylogenetically informative regions in the taxa of interest (Gnirke et al, 2009;Mamanova et al, 2010;Hale et al, 2020). Targeted sequence capture uses biotinylated RNA baits to target prepared sequencing library fragments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Prep Kit following the published protocol for this kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswitch, MA, USA), and quantified using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 DNA 1000 kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Libraries were pooled at equimolar concentrations into two pools of six prior to probe hybridization following the Arbor Biosciences myBaits protocol v 3.0.1 andHale et al (2020). The hybridized samples were subsequently pooled at equimolar ratios and sequenced at the Texas Tech Center for Biotechnology and Genomics using a MiSeq with the Micro chemistry and 150 bp paired-end reads (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%