2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3532053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain relief at the GaSb/GaAs interface versus substrate surface treatment and AlSb interlayers thickness

Abstract: Using transmission electron microscopy we investigate the influence of AlSb monolayers and substrate surface preparation on the microstructure of GaSb grown on GaAs ͑001͒ by molecular beam epitaxy. The geometric phase analysis method is used to analyze the interface dislocation type and the residual strain, as well as the dislocation core behavior versus the thickness of the AlSb interface layer. A quantitative measurement of the local Burgers vectors shows that the misfit dislocations at the GaSb/GaAs interfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The repeatable IMF mode requires atomically smooth GaAs surface, relatively low temperature on GaAs surface and a negligibly low partial pressure of As in a growth chamber [27]. For the growth of GaSb/GaAs heterostructures applying IMF mode the technological conditions determined in previous sub-sections were employed: thermal treatment of GaAs substrate and growth conditions of GaSb layers.…”
Section: The Gasb/gaas Heterostructure With Imfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repeatable IMF mode requires atomically smooth GaAs surface, relatively low temperature on GaAs surface and a negligibly low partial pressure of As in a growth chamber [27]. For the growth of GaSb/GaAs heterostructures applying IMF mode the technological conditions determined in previous sub-sections were employed: thermal treatment of GaAs substrate and growth conditions of GaSb layers.…”
Section: The Gasb/gaas Heterostructure With Imfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Although it could be expected to obtain only the 90 MDs due to their energetically favourable state with respect to the 60 ones, both types are usually observed in this system at similar growth conditions. [7][8][9] The 60 MDs generate threading dislocations (TDs), which emerging from the interface glide to the surface resulting in material degradation, decrementing its electrical and optical properties. 10,11 Understanding the mechanism that determines defect type and density at the GaSb/ GaAs interface depending on growth conditions is crucial since 90 MDs can completely relax the system, without formation of any TDs, whereas the 60 MDs can glide or interact with 90 MDs causing them also to glide further deteriorating the device performance by creation of more TDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cross-sectional samples, slices of 2x5 mm 2 in size were cut from the substrate side along the [110] and [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] directions. Two of the slices were glued face to face and packed in a copper tube of 3 mm in diameter with the epoxy glue, then the tube were cut in to disk of about 800 m in thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%