2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain rate effect on the out-of-plane dynamic compressive behavior of metallic honeycombs: Experiment and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been observed that the crush strength depends on cell shape (hexagonal cells with different branch angles were studied) [18,19,20,21,22] and wall thickness [23,24,25,26]. The honeycomb structures were investigated with numerical analysis or experimentally in both in-plane [27,28,29,30,31] and out-of-plane directions [20,32,33,34,35,36] to obtain various parameters to provide answers about the mechanisms of failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that the crush strength depends on cell shape (hexagonal cells with different branch angles were studied) [18,19,20,21,22] and wall thickness [23,24,25,26]. The honeycomb structures were investigated with numerical analysis or experimentally in both in-plane [27,28,29,30,31] and out-of-plane directions [20,32,33,34,35,36] to obtain various parameters to provide answers about the mechanisms of failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the out-of-plane compressive strength of aluminium hexagonal honeycomb is 2 times greater than the in-plane compressive strength [11]. Extensive studies on the out-of-plane compressive behaviour of regular honeycombs have been reported in the literature [12][13][14][15][16]. As reported by Radford et al [12], stainless-steel square honeycombs with relative density 0.1   failed with torsional plastic buckling under quasi-static out-of-plane compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Using Kolsky pressure bar testing with a striker velocity up to 300 ms -1 , they found that the dynamic compressive response was governed by three distinct mechanisms: material rate sensitivity, inertial stabilization of the webs against buckling, and plastic wave propagation [12,13]. Tao et al [14] investigated the out-of-plane dynamic behaviour of hexagonal thin-wall aluminium honeycombs using a Split Hopkinson…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al investigated the stress-strain behaviour of ZTA/Fe45 composites by numerical simulations and found that the particle-matrix interface properties show the dominant impact for yield limit and peak stress while for the critical strain the particle volume fraction is the main factor [16]. The "Honeycomb Structure" is widely applied in the composite design, owing to its good comprehensive mechanical properties and its perfect structure [17,18]. Du J. studied the ZTA ceramic particle reinforced high chromium cast iron composites (HCCI) with a honeycomb structure obtained by infiltration casting and acquired the best casting process parameters by a finite element calculation [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%