2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stomatal resistance of New Guinea Impatiens pot plants. Part 2: Model extension for water restriction and application to irrigation scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the PET_r cs often exceeds PET_ref in growing seasons and becomes lower than it in nongrowing seasons (Figure S18 in Supporting Information S1). Important to note that these temporal dynamic patterns of PET_r cs are in line with the observed evapotranspiration in well-watered fields found in previous studies (Cannavo et al, 2016;Uddin et al, 2016). Besides these, the PET_r cs also exceeds PET_ref in arid and semiarid regions, and in the tropic forests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the PET_r cs often exceeds PET_ref in growing seasons and becomes lower than it in nongrowing seasons (Figure S18 in Supporting Information S1). Important to note that these temporal dynamic patterns of PET_r cs are in line with the observed evapotranspiration in well-watered fields found in previous studies (Cannavo et al, 2016;Uddin et al, 2016). Besides these, the PET_r cs also exceeds PET_ref in arid and semiarid regions, and in the tropic forests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The reverse mechanism takes place under water scarcity. Stomatal opening and closing can be assessed through the evolution of Rs which defines the plant-atmosphere interactions, strongly influencing the rate of gas exchange, and hence, photosynthesis and transpiration [55,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, a linear regression model with indicator variables was applied having R 2 = 74.20% (adjusted R 2 = 70.89%) and a linear model was estimated for each stress level. The equation of the fitted model is: y = 0.72 − 0.44x − 10.70I 40 − 2.69I 55 − 9.46xI 40 − 2.32xI 55 where y is the dependent/response variable (stomatal resistance, Rs), x is the predictor variable (leaf water potential, Ψ) and I i , i = 40, 55 are indicators variables where I i = 1 if the data belongs to stress level T i and I i = 0 otherwise. This equation describes three linear models that are shown in Table 4 and Figure 5.…”
Section: Stress Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net radiation flux (R n ) absorbed by the crop can be systematically assumed to be equal to the net radiation measured above the crop, thus neglecting the radiation exchanged below the canopy and the ground. Thus, net radiation above the canopy is almost equal to the total shortwave irradiance R sw − (Wm ) 2 during the day (Cannavo et al, 2016).…”
Section: Dynamic Response Of the Plant Canopy Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%