2015
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic soil water balance under seasonal climates

Abstract: The analysis of soil water partitioning in seasonally dry climates necessarily requires careful consideration of the periodic climatic forcing at the intra-annual timescale in addition to daily scale variabilities. Here, we introduce three new extensions to a stochastic soil moisture model which yields seasonal evolution of soil moisture and relevant hydrological fluxes. These approximations allow seasonal climatic forcings (e.g. rainfall and potential evapotranspiration) to be fully resolved, extending the an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we will use the crossing of mean soil moisture s as proxy for the mean crossing of stochastic soil moisture trajectories, even while acknowledging that they are not exactly the same (Rodriguez‐Iturbe & Porporato, , Chapter 3). By averaging the soil water balance (Eqn S1), we have an approximation describing the time course of mean soil moisture s over the dry season (Laio et al ., ; Feng et al ., ), where the effect of the minimal runoff losses is assumed to be negligible for determining the mean soil moisture trajectory, dsdt=λditalicγηfalse⟨sfalse⟩snormalwssnormalwsnormalw<false⟨sfalse⟩sλditalicγηs<false⟨sfalse⟩s1, where η=Enormalmax/false(nZrfalse) , γ=nZnormalr/italicαnormald, and λ d and α d are the mean rainfall frequency and intensity during the dry season. The mean soil moisture during the wet season snormalwet (Eqn ) serves as the initial value for Eqn (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we will use the crossing of mean soil moisture s as proxy for the mean crossing of stochastic soil moisture trajectories, even while acknowledging that they are not exactly the same (Rodriguez‐Iturbe & Porporato, , Chapter 3). By averaging the soil water balance (Eqn S1), we have an approximation describing the time course of mean soil moisture s over the dry season (Laio et al ., ; Feng et al ., ), where the effect of the minimal runoff losses is assumed to be negligible for determining the mean soil moisture trajectory, dsdt=λditalicγηfalse⟨sfalse⟩snormalwssnormalwsnormalw<false⟨sfalse⟩sλditalicγηs<false⟨sfalse⟩s1, where η=Enormalmax/false(nZrfalse) , γ=nZnormalr/italicαnormald, and λ d and α d are the mean rainfall frequency and intensity during the dry season. The mean soil moisture during the wet season snormalwet (Eqn ) serves as the initial value for Eqn (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where the rainfall during the dry season is high enough to generate substantial runoff and invalidate the macroscopic approximation, an alternate, iterative approach to finding the trajectory of mean soil moisture should be used [e.g., the self‐consistent approximation in Feng et al . ()].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[] and Feng et al . [] for the case of seasonal changes in the ensemble soil moisture. The potential advantages provided by overcoming the closure problem would be remarkable in that the resulting equations are deterministic dynamical systems that naturally embed the effect of stochastic external forcing while being amenable to dynamical system analysis.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Stochastic Forcing and Nonlinear Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of precipitation, soil moisture remains below field capacity, so gravitational runoff and drainage in the rooting zone are negligible (Feng et al. , Dingman ). This model tracks total moisture and thus allows for redistribution within the rooting zone, for example through hydraulic lift or catenary subsurface flow, although we do not model these processes explicitly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%