Perforin (pfp) and interferon-␥ (IFN-␥
IntroductionConsiderable attention has been paid to the direct antitumor activities of cytotoxic lymphocytes within innate and acquired components of the cellular immunity. 1 However, until recently, little information was available regarding the relative role of direct cytotoxicity in immunity against tumor development. The development of gene-targeted mice deficient in perforin (pfp) 2 and the discovery of several members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily with the capacity to induce tumor cell apoptosis [3][4][5] have paved the way to determining which effector molecules are relevant in tumor immune surveillance. Thus far, in mouse experimental tumor systems, pfp has been demonstrated to protect the host against tumor initiation, 6 primary tumor growth, 6,7 and tumor metastasis. 8 Perforin enables the entry of granzymes that play a key role in target cell DNA fragmentation, but these serine esterases are not critical for tumor cell death mediated by effector cells. 9,10 Concerning innate cytotoxicity mediated by NK cells, a role for Fas ligand (FasL) and other TNF family members in tumor immune surveillance is less obvious. Notably, in some models involving innate antitumor activity, natural killer (NK) celldepleted mice were often significantly more susceptible to tumor metastasis than pfp-deficient mice, despite the lack of activity of FasL or TNF against these tumors in vivo. 8 These observations suggested that other pfp-independent effector functions may be contributing to tumor protection.In this light, IFN-␥ is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a central role in innate and adaptive arms of host immune defense. 11,12 IFN-␥ is secreted by NK cells and thymus-derived T cells under certain conditions of activation. 13,14 IFN-␥ acts in various ways on host and tumor cells to favor tumor regression, but the relative role that IFN-␥ plays in antitumor responses, compared with direct cytotoxicity by effector molecules such as pfp, has not been previously evaluated. Two studies have elegantly demonstrated a role for IFN-␥ in tumor immune surveillance 15,16 ; however, neither of these determined how important IFN-␥ function was compared with direct cytotoxicity mediated by innate effector cells. Herein, we have undertaken the first study to compare directly the relative role of pfp and IFN-␥ in 3 distinct models of tumor immunity. The 3 tumor models used are distinguished by different relative contributions of NK cells and NK1.1 ϩ T (NKT) cells in host protection. Regardless of the relative role of NK and NKT cells, the creation of mice doubly deficient for pfp and IFN-␥ has demonstrated that these 2 effector arms can act independently and equally effectively yet together account for all the natural antitumor immunity mediated by NK and NKT cells.
Materials and methods
Mice
Cell culture and chromium 51 Cr release assaysThe mouse tumor cell lines and spleen cell cultures used in this study were maintained as previously described. 8,19,20 Cytotoxicity of freshly i...