2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5dt02674a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoretentive formylation of (S)-proline: new application of the self-regeneration of stereo-centres (SRS) principle via chelation to cobalt(iii)

Abstract: In a Vilsmeier-Haack-type formylation reaction the α-(dihydroxymethyl)-(S)-prolinato complex (+)578-p-[Co(tren){(RC,SN)-Pro[CH(OH)2]O}]Cl2·2H2O (22) was produced stereoselectively (85% ee) from the (S)-prolinato complex, (+)578-p-[Co(tren){(SC,SN)-ProO}]2(H3O)2(HOEt2)(O3SCF3)7 (18). Similar reaction of the (S)-alaninato complex, (-)578-p-[Co(tren)(S-AlaO)](H3O)(O3SCF3)3 (13), produced the racemate, rac-p-[Co(tren)(Ala{CH(OH)2}O)]SO4·2H2O (17). The contrasting stereochemical outcomes of the formylation reaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(190 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rigorous examination and consideration of the nomenclature challenges inherent in these situations has been limited, and the development and codification of required nomenclature has also lagged. As a consequence, ad hoc and mutually inconsistent approaches have been developed by individual research groups to address their particular needs [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123]. It is clear that these situations are certainly not adequately covered in the standard recommendations from IUPAC [20,124].…”
Section: A Note On Stereochemical Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigorous examination and consideration of the nomenclature challenges inherent in these situations has been limited, and the development and codification of required nomenclature has also lagged. As a consequence, ad hoc and mutually inconsistent approaches have been developed by individual research groups to address their particular needs [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123]. It is clear that these situations are certainly not adequately covered in the standard recommendations from IUPAC [20,124].…”
Section: A Note On Stereochemical Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%