2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo vision and shadow analysis for landing hazard detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) Use in addition the texture analyses algorithm to provide a protective layer after rock modeling, a simple texture analyses such as windowed image variance can efficiently find the edges of rocks and avoid the rocks underestimated, which can solve the problem 2) above. If the size of rocks is overestimated, it does not matter, the lander is still safe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Use in addition the texture analyses algorithm to provide a protective layer after rock modeling, a simple texture analyses such as windowed image variance can efficiently find the edges of rocks and avoid the rocks underestimated, which can solve the problem 2) above. If the size of rocks is overestimated, it does not matter, the lander is still safe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpler methods based on homography estimation have been proposed for surface slope estimation that either assume the presence of a flat ground plane [3] or rely on the efficient proposal of candidate landing sites [5]. Stereo vision systems have also been investigated [33,50], however, generally require a large baseline making them less suitable for smaller platforms.…”
Section: Unprepared Landing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success rate of the detection method is dependent on the number of pixels which comprise the shadow length. 12 Shadows which are comprised of only a few pixels can be rejected as noise; a shadow composed of many pixels is less ambiguous and so the true detection rate increases with shadow length. The false negative (F N) detection rate is modeled as a linear function of the number of pixels, called q.…”
Section: Probability Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%