2018
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2018.1458137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Step-Down diagnostic analysis for monitoring the covariance matrix of bivariate normal processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method proposed by Sullivan et al [2007] is also applicable for non-normal multivariate data. Mingoti and Pinto [2018] showed that the method of Sullivan et al (2007) has better detection power than both VMAX and VMIX control charts under the bivariate normal assumption. Zou et al [2011] considered the sparsity feature in high-dimensional processes and argued that a fault diagnosis problem is similar to the variable or model selection problem in this setting.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Out-of-control Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed by Sullivan et al [2007] is also applicable for non-normal multivariate data. Mingoti and Pinto [2018] showed that the method of Sullivan et al (2007) has better detection power than both VMAX and VMIX control charts under the bivariate normal assumption. Zou et al [2011] considered the sparsity feature in high-dimensional processes and argued that a fault diagnosis problem is similar to the variable or model selection problem in this setting.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Out-of-control Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%