Staying with People Who Slap Us Around: Gender, Juggling Responsibilities and Violence in Paid (and Unpaid) Care Work

Abstract

Little is actually known about women's occupational health, let alone how men and women may experience similar jobs and health risks differently. Drawing on data from a larger study of social service workers, this article examines four areas where gender is pivotal to the new ways of organizing caring labour, including the expansion of unpaid work and the use of personal resources to subsidize agency resources; gender-neutral violence; gender-specific violence and the juggling of home and work responsibilities. Collective assumptions and expectations about how men and women should perform care work result in men's partial insulation from the more intense forms of exploitation, stress and violence. This article looks at health risks, not merely as compensable occupational health concerns, but as avoidable products of forms of work organization that draw on notions of the endlessly stretchable capacity of women to provide care work in any context, including a context of violence. Indeed, the logic of women's elastic caring appear crucial to the survival of some agencies and the gender order in these workplaces.he literature on occupational health is focused, rather myopically, on hazards common to the work sites in which men are employed. This restricts the field of inquiry, excluding many hazards encountered in 'women's' work sites (Feldberg et al .

The Phenomenon of Staff Volunteering: How Far Can You Stretch the Psychological Contract in a Nonprofit Organization?

“…This finding of the blurred boundaries is consistent with the previous literature on emotional labor and caring labor (e.g., Aronson and Neysmith 1996;Finch and Groves 1983;James 1992;Kaplan Daniels 1987;Baines 2006).…”

‘You Can’t Win’: The Non-Profit Double-Bind and Experiences of Organisational Contradictions in the Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector

“…An increasing prevalence of such behaviours should be of concern because of their implications for employee wellbeing (Baines, 2006) and the adverse link to the provision of personalised care (Newman et al, 2008). …”

Employee perceptions of HRM and well-being in nonprofit organizations: unpacking the unintended

“…For example, favorable responses to HRM in low pay social care work have been accounted for by social norms that privilege altruism, thereby mitigating employees' negative responses (Atkinson and Lucas, 2013). Additional studies point to nonprofit employees' seemingly self-perpetuating commitment regardless of wages and working conditions along with their astounding resilience and ability to tolerate increasing levels of stress and even increased violence and harassment at the workplace (Baines, 2010;Baines, 2006;Nickson, Warhurst, Dutton and Hurrell, 2008). A further strand of research highlighting employees' positive perceptions of rudimentary HRM points towards the role of the implementation process and employees' low expectations in these NPOs compared to those with more sophisticated HR practices (Piening, Baluch and Ridder, 2014).…”