1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(1998)107:27+<65::aid-ajpa4>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stature estimation and calibration: Bayesian and maximum likelihood perspectives in physical anthropology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When Pearson first introduced regression for stature estimation, he also set the trend for using the inverse calibration method (Pearson, 1899). Depending on the context, other statistical methods may actually be better (Konigsberg et al, 1998). When stature is used as the y variable, it implies that the bone length measured causes stature, which is an improbable causal relationship.…”
Section: Statistical Methods: Another Case Of Apples To Orangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When Pearson first introduced regression for stature estimation, he also set the trend for using the inverse calibration method (Pearson, 1899). Depending on the context, other statistical methods may actually be better (Konigsberg et al, 1998). When stature is used as the y variable, it implies that the bone length measured causes stature, which is an improbable causal relationship.…”
Section: Statistical Methods: Another Case Of Apples To Orangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this same statistical review (Konigsberg et al, 1998), classical calibration is the regression of bone length on stature, and then solving for stature or x ¼ (y-b)/m. Stature is essentially estimated by ordinary least squares.…”
Section: Statistical Methods: Another Case Of Apples To Orangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations