2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10009-014-0329-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical model checking for stochastic hybrid systems involving nondeterminism over continuous domains

Abstract: Behavioral verification of technical systems invol ving both discrete and continuous components is a common and demanding task. The behavior of such systems can often be characterized using stochastic hybrid automata, leading to verification problems which can be formalized and solved using stochastic logic calculi such as stochastic satisfiability modulo theory (SSMT). While algorithms for discharging proof obligations in SSMT form exist, their applicability is limited due to the computational complexity, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it supports only discrete random variables, while ProbReach accepts continuous and discrete random initial parameters. A recent work [2] proposes a statistical model checking technique for verifying hybrid systems with continuous nondeterminism, thereby significantly expanding the class of systems analysable. However, the approach is based on statistical planning algorithms from AI, and therefore it cannot offer the absolute guarantees provided by ProbReach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it supports only discrete random variables, while ProbReach accepts continuous and discrete random initial parameters. A recent work [2] proposes a statistical model checking technique for verifying hybrid systems with continuous nondeterminism, thereby significantly expanding the class of systems analysable. However, the approach is based on statistical planning algorithms from AI, and therefore it cannot offer the absolute guarantees provided by ProbReach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a sizable amount of work on tools for formal analysis of probabilistic reachability, although they all have limitations that make them unsuitable for our approach. SiSAT [15] uses an SMT approach for probabilistic hybrid systems with discrete nondeterminism, while continuous nondeterminism is handled via Monte Carlo techniques only [11]; UPPAAL [7] uses statistical model checking to analyze nonlinear stochastic hybrid automata; ProHVer [36] computes upper bounds for maximal reachability probabilities, but continuous random parameters are analyzed via discrete overapproximations [14]; U-Check [5] enables parameter synthesis and statistical model checking of stochastic hybrid systems [4]). However, this approach is based on Gaussian process emulation and optimisation, and provides only statistical guarantees and requires certain smoothness conditions on the satisfaction probability function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation supports H 1 if (7) holds. In this case, the variable count is incremented, terminating when it reaches K. Otherwise, count is reset to 0, and and u are updated to satisfy (7).…”
Section: Generalization and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to recent papers by Zuliani et al [8] and Ellen et al [7] that use reinforcement learning techniques to verify the correctness properties under the worst case values of non-deterministic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%