2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods for dementia risk prediction and recommendations for future work: A systematic review

Abstract: Introduction Numerous dementia risk prediction models have been developed in the past decade. However, methodological limitations of the analytical tools used may hamper their ability to generate reliable dementia risk scores. We aim to review the used methodologies. Methods We systematically reviewed the literature from March 2014 to September 2018 for publications presenting a dementia risk prediction model. We critically discuss the analytical techniques used in the literature. Results In total 137 publicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have also explored features obtained from sources, such as neuropsychological assessments (Barnes et al, 2009 ; Johnson et al, 2009 ; Lee et al, 2018 ; Adam et al, 2020 ). While these attempts have shown promising results, the prediction algorithms are mostly trained with samples containing diagnosis information and therefore unable to predict beyond the critical window of diagnosis (Prince et al, 2018 ), making these models ungeneralizable to relatively younger populations (Goerdten et al, 2019 ). Furthermore, despite these promising results achieved by machine learning-based approaches for dementia, their utility in healthcare settings remains limited partly due to the difficultly in interpreting the outputs of these models (Pellegrini et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have also explored features obtained from sources, such as neuropsychological assessments (Barnes et al, 2009 ; Johnson et al, 2009 ; Lee et al, 2018 ; Adam et al, 2020 ). While these attempts have shown promising results, the prediction algorithms are mostly trained with samples containing diagnosis information and therefore unable to predict beyond the critical window of diagnosis (Prince et al, 2018 ), making these models ungeneralizable to relatively younger populations (Goerdten et al, 2019 ). Furthermore, despite these promising results achieved by machine learning-based approaches for dementia, their utility in healthcare settings remains limited partly due to the difficultly in interpreting the outputs of these models (Pellegrini et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers in highincome countries (HICs) are working on models that allow reliable risk prediction. 1 However, the greatest increase in the number of people with dementia will be in developing countries, 2 for which research on dementia is often limited or non-existent. Blossom Stephan and colleagues' study 3 in The Lancet Global Health fills this research gap.…”
Section: Challenges In Dementia Risk Prediction In Low-income and Midmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were more than 50 million people living with dementia in 2016 worldwide, and this number is expected to increase with an increase in life expectancy [ 7 ]. It is one of the most common causes of disability among this group [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%