2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical learning and prosodic bootstrapping differentially affect neural synchronization during speech segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If participants detect these statistical regularities, a steady-state response should emerge at the word presentation rate. Such artificial grammars proved particularly useful to directly explore the cerebral bases of an online learning mechanism ( Batterink and Paller, 2017 , 2019 ; Batterink and Zhang, 2022 ; Buiatti et al, 2009 ; Elmer et al, 2021 ; Farthouat et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Henin et al, 2021 ; Ordin et al, 2020 ; Ramos-Escobar et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If participants detect these statistical regularities, a steady-state response should emerge at the word presentation rate. Such artificial grammars proved particularly useful to directly explore the cerebral bases of an online learning mechanism ( Batterink and Paller, 2017 , 2019 ; Batterink and Zhang, 2022 ; Buiatti et al, 2009 ; Elmer et al, 2021 ; Farthouat et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Henin et al, 2021 ; Ordin et al, 2020 ; Ramos-Escobar et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when trialto-trial responses follow a similar phase pattern, the ITPC should increase relative to the presentation of the stimulus (Luck and Kappenman, 2012). ITPC in combination with ERP was shown to be sensitive to speech integration in delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands between 100 and 600 ms after stimulus onset (Nash-Kille and Sharma, 2014;Sorati and Behne, 2019;Elmer et al, 2021). Our results highlight significant ITPC between words with stereotyped time-locked responses (∼0.6), and significant between-participant ITPC with partial phase synchrony (∼0.25).…”
Section: High Inter-individual Heterogeneity For Emotion Perception I...mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A more direct way to assess implicit word representations may be to use EEG measures during the passive familiarization phase. Robust event related potentials have been reported for violations of words' transitional and phonotactic probabilities (e.g., Elmer et al, 2021;François et al, 2017). In an ongoing EEG study, we are measuring whether participants will show similar ERPs to violations of transitional and phonotactic information presented in the Balanced and in the Conflict languages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%