Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
70
36
13
2
Citation Types
4
123
2
10
Year Published
Range
2011
20112025
2025Publication Types
Select...
109
3
2
Relationship
1
113
Authors
Journals
Cited by 114 publications
(139 citation statements)
References 47 publications
4
123
2
10
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Finally, we have provided an illustration with real data. In this illustration, TMLE with machine learning produced a hazard ratio estimate suggesting less benefit from statin persistence than the traditional Cox model, which is more consistent with previous results of randomized controlled trials (OR for all‐cause mortality = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.94], RR for cardiovascular disease = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.80]) [66]. TMLE also allowed for the estimation of the counterfactual survival curve.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Finally, we have provided an illustration with real data. In this illustration, TMLE with machine learning produced a hazard ratio estimate suggesting less benefit from statin persistence than the traditional Cox model, which is more consistent with previous results of randomized controlled trials (OR for all‐cause mortality = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.94], RR for cardiovascular disease = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.80]) [66]. TMLE also allowed for the estimation of the counterfactual survival curve.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In a metaanalysis of 76 trials evaluating the effect of statins in 170,255 patients with a risk factor for a cardiovascular event, Mills and coworkers (15) reported a 10% reduction in all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.94). This finding was consistent with four other metaanalyses evaluating the effect of statins on cardiovascular events; relative risks for all-cause mortality in these studies ranged from 0.84 to 0.89 (16)(17)(18)(19). Additionally, in an analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating molecular-targeted therapies for stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer, Hotta and coworkers (20) identified 11 trials evaluating three currently approved agents for which overall survival was a primary or secondary endpoint.…”
Section: Figure
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the authors' conclusion caution should be taken in prescribing statins for primary prevention among people at low cardiovascular risk [13]. This was also in concordance with recently published articles [14,15].…”
Section: Statins In Primary Prevention
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Finally, we have provided an illustration with real data. In this illustration, TMLE with machine learning produced a hazard ratio estimate suggesting less benefit from statin persistence than the traditional Cox model, which is more consistent with previous results of randomized controlled trials (OR for all‐cause mortality = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.94], RR for cardiovascular disease = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.80]) [66]. TMLE also allowed for the estimation of the counterfactual survival curve.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In a metaanalysis of 76 trials evaluating the effect of statins in 170,255 patients with a risk factor for a cardiovascular event, Mills and coworkers (15) reported a 10% reduction in all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.94). This finding was consistent with four other metaanalyses evaluating the effect of statins on cardiovascular events; relative risks for all-cause mortality in these studies ranged from 0.84 to 0.89 (16)(17)(18)(19). Additionally, in an analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating molecular-targeted therapies for stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer, Hotta and coworkers (20) identified 11 trials evaluating three currently approved agents for which overall survival was a primary or secondary endpoint.…”
Section: Figure
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the authors' conclusion caution should be taken in prescribing statins for primary prevention among people at low cardiovascular risk [13]. This was also in concordance with recently published articles [14,15].…”
Section: Statins In Primary Prevention
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Finally, we have provided an illustration with real data. In this illustration, TMLE with machine learning produced a hazard ratio estimate suggesting less benefit from statin persistence than the traditional Cox model, which is more consistent with previous results of randomized controlled trials (OR for all‐cause mortality = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.94], RR for cardiovascular disease = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.80]) [66]. TMLE also allowed for the estimation of the counterfactual survival curve.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In a metaanalysis of 76 trials evaluating the effect of statins in 170,255 patients with a risk factor for a cardiovascular event, Mills and coworkers (15) reported a 10% reduction in all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.94). This finding was consistent with four other metaanalyses evaluating the effect of statins on cardiovascular events; relative risks for all-cause mortality in these studies ranged from 0.84 to 0.89 (16)(17)(18)(19). Additionally, in an analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating molecular-targeted therapies for stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer, Hotta and coworkers (20) identified 11 trials evaluating three currently approved agents for which overall survival was a primary or secondary endpoint.…”
Section: Figure
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the authors' conclusion caution should be taken in prescribing statins for primary prevention among people at low cardiovascular risk [13]. This was also in concordance with recently published articles [14,15].…”
Section: Statins In Primary Prevention
supporting
confidence: 88%