2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(00)00033-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-of-the-art of geotechnical earthquake engineering practice

Abstract: Major developments in geotechnical earthquake engineering practice over the last 15 years are reviewed. The objectives of the review are to present a coherent view of the current state of practice at the highest level and to examine trends, which may shape practice in the future. Developments are described in the following areas: speci®cation of design ground motions, dynamic response analysis, evaluation of liquefaction potential, evaluation of residual strength of lique®ed soil, post-liquefaction displacemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide variety of field and laboratory techniques are available for this purpose each with having different advantages and limitations with respect to different problems. In the last century, a significant progress has been done in terms of identifying soil liquefaction and associated ground failures [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of field and laboratory techniques are available for this purpose each with having different advantages and limitations with respect to different problems. In the last century, a significant progress has been done in terms of identifying soil liquefaction and associated ground failures [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The undrained liquefaction behaviour under static and cyclic loading was generally analyzed in terms of density indices such as the relative density, D r [22,23] and void ratio, e [24]. In this study, relative density was varied and corresponding void ratio was calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belkhatir et al [17,18] imply that the strength silty sand up to 50% fines content is less then that of the clean sand for constant dry density approach. Dash and Sitharam [19,20] proposed that the strength parameter initially increases till 5% silt content and thereafter decreases rapidly till around the limiting fines content (LFC) (explained in "Limiting fines content") and finally remain relatively constant for all the silt contents till even pure silt at constant relative density approach, though Karim and Alam [21] found this peak (for 5% silt content) when the specimens were prepared by air pluviation method not for moist temping method.The undrained liquefaction behaviour under static and cyclic loading was generally analyzed in terms of density indices such as the relative density, D r [22,23] and void ratio, e [24]. In this study, relative density was varied and corresponding void ratio was calculated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the method with which site amplification is estimated is still a major concern and under investigation among seismologists and earthquake engineers. Developing methods for assessing the nature and potential of soil amplification is important, especially when choosing the location and design of critical and essential facilities [1], [2], [3]. Studying soil response means understanding earthquake source, source nature and distance, wave path, geologic context, upper soil properties, topography and primarily site effects [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%