2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9050331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-of-the-Art Geospatial Information Processing in NoSQL Databases

Abstract: Geospatial information has been indispensable for many application fields, including traffic planning, urban planning, and energy management. Geospatial data are mainly stored in relational databases that have been developed over several decades, and most geographic information applications are desktop applications. With the arrival of big data, geospatial information applications are also being modified into, e.g., mobile platforms and Geospatial Web Services, which require changeable data schemas, faster que… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(178 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amazon DynamoDB is a document-based key-value database, so it brings an approach to database modelling different from traditional relational databases [39]. Amazon DynamoDB was used as a database component to store all entities.…”
Section: Used Services In Amazon Web Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amazon DynamoDB is a document-based key-value database, so it brings an approach to database modelling different from traditional relational databases [39]. Amazon DynamoDB was used as a database component to store all entities.…”
Section: Used Services In Amazon Web Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• more flexible scalability, also in comparison with the relational model [6]. At the same time, the disadvantages of NoSQL DBMS when working with spatial data are also present and among the most significant it should be noted:…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The big trajectory systems include a cloud-based system on Microsoft Azure [21], ST-Hadoop [9], TrajSpark [272], DiStRDF [164], and systems based on Apache Flink, MongoDB [122], and other databases for semantic trajectories. Recently, Guo et al [108] have surveyed the geospatial data processing capabilities in the 10 most popular NoSQL databases based on supported geometry types, geometry functions, spatial indexes, query languages, and data formats. This survey also discussed the strengths and weaknesses of each of these databases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the meantime, a number of big data processing systems for spatio-temporal and trajectory data emerged in addition to a few new big spatial data processing systems. Though Guo et al [108] have reviewed native spatial supports of NoSQL databases, there is no comprehensive survey of big spatial data processing systems, which are developed by utilizing NoSQL databases. Moreover, there is no review available on Python libraries such as DASK and RAPIDS for big spatial data processing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%