2010
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2009.0215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State estimation for asynchronous multirate multisensor dynamic systems with missing measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly used standard for mechanical testing of scaffold is compression testing of standard cylindrical shape scaffold under the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) [35, 36]. It has been a problem to test mechanical properties of non-cylindrical scaffolds due to the absence of standard procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used standard for mechanical testing of scaffold is compression testing of standard cylindrical shape scaffold under the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) [35, 36]. It has been a problem to test mechanical properties of non-cylindrical scaffolds due to the absence of standard procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filtering problem for networked systems has been a focus of research due to their important engineering applications such as target tracking, signal processing and control application [5][6][7][8]. It is well known that the Kalman filtering is the classical scheme to deal with the estimation problem effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For sensors having different sampling rates at different scales, multiscale system theory is a useful tool. Our work stems from multiscale system theory but provides a new multiscale modeling architecture that is not limited to the wavelet [10,11,33]. In [11], the state at a coarser scale is modeled by the moving average of states at the finest scale; in [11] and [33], the backward model and the forward model were presented, respectively, through certain modifications of the moving average model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%