2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.97.023410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-dependent fluorescence of neutral atoms in optical potentials

Abstract: Recently we have demonstrated scalable, non-destructive, and high-fidelity detection of the internal state of 87 Rb neutral atoms in optical dipole traps using state-dependent fluorescence imaging [M. Martinez-Dorantes et al., PRL, 2017]. In this article we provide experimental procedures and interpretations to overcome the detrimental effects of heating-induced trap losses and state leakage. We present models for the dynamics of optically trapped atoms during state-dependent fluorescence imaging and verify ou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(51 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the fluorescence imaging, when the molasses beam are let on, the single atom lifetime is reduced to 8 s while the atom temperature does not increase. This could be due to the trapped atom dynamics under illumination with cooling light [40] or to residual loading from background Rb vapor. The atom can thus leave the trap during the 50 ms fluorescence images and we estimate that this second cause of detection errors amount to 0.6 %.…”
Section: State Preparation and Detection Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the fluorescence imaging, when the molasses beam are let on, the single atom lifetime is reduced to 8 s while the atom temperature does not increase. This could be due to the trapped atom dynamics under illumination with cooling light [40] or to residual loading from background Rb vapor. The atom can thus leave the trap during the 50 ms fluorescence images and we estimate that this second cause of detection errors amount to 0.6 %.…”
Section: State Preparation and Detection Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the SDB is weak and on-resonance, the internal atomic dynamics can be described by quantum jumps between ground and excited states. In a very simple model, which assumes a perfectly flat excited state potential U e = 0, we find an exponential DFF heating with rate Ė/E = 2U g /(mΓ 2 ) [20], where U g is the curvature of the trapping potential, E is the total energy, m the mass of the atom, Γ the exited-state decay rate and Ė is the average energy gain [21]. This result indicates that for steep optical traps with tight confinement (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest experiments with neutral-atom microtraps employed large vacuum systems and customdesigned optics [17]. More recent works have employed high-NA aspheric lenses in smaller vacuum systems, which has enabled experiments with high-NA optical access from two [2,18] and four [19][20][21][22] directions. The latter scenario is known as the Maltese cross geometry (MCG) when the lenses are placed on the cardinal directions, as illustrated in Figure 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%