2009
DOI: 10.1109/icde.2009.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STAR: Steiner-Tree Approximation in Relationship Graphs

Abstract: We would like to thank Gerard de Melo for the thorough proof reading of this report and his helpful comments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bidirectional search) expansion strategy starting from every input node of the query. While many effective heuristics on guiding and speeding up the Breadth-First Search in this setting have been proposed (BANKS [1], Bidirectional [7], STAR [9]), their performance is still poor on very large instances of graph data. Index only: Perform extensive indexing of the graph, and after that do not use the original graph at all.…”
Section: Problem Difficulty and Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bidirectional search) expansion strategy starting from every input node of the query. While many effective heuristics on guiding and speeding up the Breadth-First Search in this setting have been proposed (BANKS [1], Bidirectional [7], STAR [9]), their performance is still poor on very large instances of graph data. Index only: Perform extensive indexing of the graph, and after that do not use the original graph at all.…”
Section: Problem Difficulty and Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bidirectional [7] improves on this method by adding the forward-directed traversal, reducing the number of iterators, and prioritizing nodes with low degrees for expansion. STAR [9] follows the intuition of heuristic local search. Initially, a candidate tree is constructed by similar breadthfirst expansions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, its OMS has an open plug-in (API) architecture for using any RDF/S store and semantic reasoner as appropriate and is realized with the LarKC platform 10 . The OMS query decider routes semantic queries to OMS plug-ins available for the RDF triple stores SwiftOLIM (with RDF materialization of OWL2 under OWL-Horst semantics) and AllegroGraph, the semantic OWL-DL reasoner Pellet 11 with internal Jena RDF store, and the RDF relational reasoner STAR [14]. Second, semantic query answering and service handling by the GSE is upon request only, in particular, the GSE does not actively communicate semantic updates of the global ontology to other components; this avoids communication bottleneck and supports the paradigm of perception-based knowledge for BDI agents (cf.…”
Section: Global Semantics Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a relational object query like "How are scene objects doorAB, doorBC and roomC related ?" is processed by STAR by reduction to the corresponding NP-hard Steiner-Tree problem for the RDF graph of the materialized global ontology followed by the polynomial computation of an approximated solution in O(nlogn) in terms of minimal RDF object property-based path [14]. The pattern-based conversion of the result by our STAR-plugin of the OMS eventually yields a more human-readable answer (rather than just a list of RDF triples) like "doorAB leads to roomB from where doorBC leads to roomC."…”
Section: Global Semantics Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%