2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star formation rates and efficiencies in the Galactic Centre

Abstract: The inner few hundred parsecs of the Milky Way harbours gas densities, pressures, velocity dispersions, an interstellar radiation field and a cosmic ray ionisation rate orders of magnitude higher than the disc; akin to the environment found in star-forming galaxies at high-redshift. Previous studies have shown that this region is forming stars at a rate per unit mass of dense gas which is at least an order of magnitude lower than in the disc, potentially violating theoretical predictions. We show that all obse… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
215
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
23
215
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also matches the apparent requirements for turbulent models to match observations of dense gas, IR, and CO in nearby galaxies (García-Burillo et al 2012;Usero et al 2015). However, our inferred ǫ ff is much lower than values measured for the nearest molecular clouds by Evans et al (2014), Murray (2011), or Lee et al (2016 (see also Lada et al 2010Lada et al , 2012, as well as for molecular clouds orbiting the Galactic Center by Barnes et al (2017). It is also much lower than the values commonly adopted in analytic theories and numerical simulations (e.g., see Krumholz et al 2012;Agertz & Kravtsov 2015, among many others).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It also matches the apparent requirements for turbulent models to match observations of dense gas, IR, and CO in nearby galaxies (García-Burillo et al 2012;Usero et al 2015). However, our inferred ǫ ff is much lower than values measured for the nearest molecular clouds by Evans et al (2014), Murray (2011), or Lee et al (2016 (see also Lada et al 2010Lada et al , 2012, as well as for molecular clouds orbiting the Galactic Center by Barnes et al (2017). It is also much lower than the values commonly adopted in analytic theories and numerical simulations (e.g., see Krumholz et al 2012;Agertz & Kravtsov 2015, among many others).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Barnes et al (2017) extend the SF sequence downstream from SgrB2 by finding evidence of a gradual increase in stellar feedback activity as measured from the size of the hot gas bubbles driven by young massive stars. The Arches and Quintuplet clusters are found to be consistent in kinematics and age to have formed by tidally triggered cloud collapse and thus seem to fit in the GC star formation model (K15).…”
Section: Relation To Other Recent Gc Sf Researchmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…3 In particular, the theory of turbulence-regulated star formation predicts a rate of only 0.01 solar mass per year in the so-called Brick cloud near the galactic center, a rate that is indeed observed. 4 On larger, galaxy scales, shear can also contribute to reducing and regulating star formation.…”
Section: The Role Of Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%