1978
Stapedectomy for Otosclerosis With Malleus Fixation
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
20
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
4
0
0
Year Published
1981
2019
Publication Types
Select...
18
3
Relationship
0
21
Authors
Journals
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
References 2 publications
0
4
0
0
“…Several investigators have reported on the frequency of MIF among primary stapedectomy cases, which has ranged from only 0.4% to 1.6%. [8][9][10] Although the pathogenesis is not completely understood, MIF presents in the form of unilateral or, more rarely, bilateral progressive conductive hearing loss with an intact TM. Idiopathic or primary malleus fixation occurs most commonly in the later decades of life and is frequently associated with presbyacusis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have reported on the frequency of MIF among primary stapedectomy cases, which has ranged from only 0.4% to 1.6%. [8][9][10] Although the pathogenesis is not completely understood, MIF presents in the form of unilateral or, more rarely, bilateral progressive conductive hearing loss with an intact TM. Idiopathic or primary malleus fixation occurs most commonly in the later decades of life and is frequently associated with presbyacusis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately three fourths of malleus fixations are associated with stapedial otosclerosis. The incidence of malleus fixation is approximately 1%, as reported by most centers (Lippy and Schuring 1978;Powers et al 1967). Causse and Causse (1980), however, reported that malleus fixation occurs in as many as 10.6% of patients undergoing primary stapedectomy.…”
Section: Malleus Fixationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For this reason, both routine stapedectomy and revision stapedectomy were performed under local anesthesia. 5. Audiometric studies (one frequency) were performed in the operating room to monitor the patient's response before and ufter the prosthesis was placed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) negative findings, 14% (!O cases); (4) footplate not removed, 11% (8 cases); ( 5 ) oval window fistula, 7% ( 5 cases); and (6) incus problems, 4% (3 cases).…”
Section: Conductive Hearing Loss Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
