Standardization of the in-car gesture interaction space

Riener, Andreas; Ferscha, Alois; Bachmair, F.; Hagmüller, P.; Lemme, Andre; Muttenthaler, D.; Pühringer, D.; Rogner, H.; Tappe, A.; Weger, Frans de

doi:10.1145/2516540.2516544

Cited by 57 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We placed the Leap Motion device where the gear stick would be such that the interaction area is a cube on the right of the steering wheel, above the gear stick. This ensured that the gesture execution area was close to the steering wheel and gear shift, as recommended by Riener et al [32]. The measurements of the interaction box are the Leap Motion's default settings: width: 235.24 mm, height: 235.24 mm, and depth: 147.75 mm.…”

Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Novel Multimodal Feedback Techniques for In-Car Mid-Air Gesture Interaction

Shakeri

Williamson

Brewster

2017

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an investigation into the effects of different feedback modalities on mid-air gesture interaction for infotainment systems in cars. Car crashes and near-crash events are most commonly caused by driver distraction. Mid-air interaction is a way of reducing driver distraction by reducing visual demand from infotainment. Despite a range of available modalities, feedback in mid-air gesture systems is generally provided through visual displays. We conducted a simulated driving study to investigate how different types of multimodal feedback can support in-air gestures. The effects of different feedback modalities on eye gaze behaviour, and the driving and gesturing tasks are considered. We found that feedback modality influenced gesturing behaviour. However, drivers corrected falsely executed gestures more often in non-visual conditions. Our findings show that non-visual feedback can reduce visual distraction significantly.

show abstract

Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We differentiate the gestures depending on hand posture and arm movement, not the number of executions, thus the gesture set consists of five different gestures (SL, SR, V, CC, CCC). Previous research suggests the use of four to eight gestures for in-car gesture interaction [3,32,1].…”

Section: Gesturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel Multimodal Feedback Techniques for In-Car Mid-Air Gesture Interaction

Shakeri

Williamson

Brewster

2017

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…mapping is recommended due to its smaller, more easily learned gesture sets, but requires menu navigation to allow the driver to reach different contexts. The present study investigates function-associated gestures selectively mapped to UI movements, and carried out over the center console as recommended for secondary task control [14].…”

Section: Types Of Gesturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A number of researchers have explored different styles of in-vehicle AG interfaces without conducting evaluations [1,14,3]. Akyol et al designed a system that selectively mapped six static one-handed poses to either news or email functions depending on the current mode, and provided both visual and non-speech auditory feedback [1].…”

Section: Air Gestures In the Vehiclementioning

confidence: 99%

A Multimodal Air Gesture Interface for In Vehicle Menu Navigation

May

Gable

Walker

2014

Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The study showed that the 78% of the gestures were 4 simple directional swipes. Recently Riener et al [17] conducted a user elicitation for hand gestures performed in mid-air. Interestingly, there were few consistencies among the gestures performed by the different participants, except for the most frequent locations and the hand used for the gestures (mostly the right hand).…”

Section: Comparison Of In-vehicle Gestural Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gesturing on the Steering Wheel

Angelini

Carrino

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eyes on the road, hands on the wheel" is a crucial principle to be taken into account designing interactions for current in-vehicle interfaces. Gesture interaction is a promising modality that can be implemented following this principle in order to reduce driver distraction and increase safety. We present the results of a user elicitation for gestures performed on the surface of the steering wheel. We asked to 40 participants to elicit 6 gestures, for a total of 240 gestures. Based on the results of this experience, we derived a taxonomy of gestures performed on the steering wheel. The analysis of the results offers useful suggestions for the design of in-vehicle gestural interfaces based on this approach.

show abstract

Standardization of the in-car gesture interaction space

Cited by 57 publications

References 17 publications

Novel Multimodal Feedback Techniques for In-Car Mid-Air Gesture Interaction

Novel Multimodal Feedback Techniques for In-Car Mid-Air Gesture Interaction

A Multimodal Air Gesture Interface for In Vehicle Menu Navigation

Gesturing on the Steering Wheel

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About